Yeah, definitely not the intended use for either of those vehicles
how the F an A-4 can take off from that lol even with boosters
I have no idea, as i said, probably only done once if at all
1 Like
Makes as much sense as this does
1 Like
TBF as a float plane, that probably is able to take off from a carrier, especially as carriers can move quite quick when needed.
Subs are pretty slow on the surface, and jets need way more speed for takeoff
Idk navies have done weird things over the last century
For example
3 Likes
I think they are just fine. Su27 does incredibly well even without ARH (IK, R27ER is insane) and I have had fun with J8F despite it being probably one of the worst out of 13.0 ARH slingers. Still, some of the compression, I will tend to agree to his point that some of them shouldn’t be within 1.0.
Monitors, as a class of ship are just kind of mad tbh
Thats an 18 inch gun loaded via a railway system mounted on a monitor
The turret couldn’t traverse either so it was permanently stuck facing over the side with limited elevation angles
1 Like
Honestly pretty standard stuff for a monitor
2 Likes
That monitor had a 12 inch turret as well as the 18 inch gun
So long as it floats, it’s fine
That 18 inch gun also holds what i believe is the record for a hit with a naval gun vs a stationary target
That specific one, or just the model?
And was it the target they were actually aiming for, I can’t imagine that being a particularly stable gun platform
Hms general wolfe i believe it is, vs a railway bridge, its unconfirmed but believed she scored a single hit at 30 odd thousand yard range
Correction, 36000 yards was the range she fired at, which is the longest range a naval gun has ever fired at a target
1 Like
Meanwhile the longest range hit record is shared by 2 battleships, 1 is in game the other isnt
They dont you crit the autoloader.
Rounds through the front do not detonate ammo and side shots a large ammount of penetration is absorbed by K5/Relikt armour.
Because out of all the other nations they need the help the most, with them announcing they will be adding more stuff to fill gaps in the trees and more subs. Plus with the starter premiums removed.
It would make sense if they gonna add not only a sub but hopefully lower ranks.
Yea i thought subs as submarine so i got confused
I agree israel needs low tier but they dont need a sub tree there is a lot of options to add and most of them are just modified stuff so not even a lot of work for gaijin but they need to make it insted of addind more russian spaa
1 Like