Missile counter Missile method is a terrible mechanic for the game

*proceeds to not show what they’re referring to.

🫠

You mean the marketing brochure you posted?

1 Like

It’s also an interesting thing to state, because if AMRAAMS were so “good” at long range, why are other missiles like AIM-424 ‘Malice’ and AIM-174B ‘Gunslinger’ made/in development by the US? They’re the actual purpose BVRAAMs unlike AMRAAMs.

1 Like

He’s referring to this marketing brochure he posted earlier, after saying you can’t trust marketing claims lol

While also posting a news article, which we all know is such a credible source amir?

3 Likes

because pl17 exists and missile development isn’t a straight line, the aim120c is what retired the aim54 irl. pl15 is the aim120d equivalent as well. (slightly better)

It’s super duper credible, wdym?

insane coping, can’t prove me wrong I guess.

😂😂😂😂😂

Yeah I’m out. This guy’s high

2 Likes

You made the claim, the burden of proof lays on you. Not me. And you said yourself marketing claims are not reliable sources. So why don’t you get me a source that isn’t marketing claims?

Brother…

He probably can’t get his head round the idea that anyone invents anything outside of America.

Whatever you do, don’t show him an Atlas.

Hahahahahah…no.

Literally have the strongest flight model in the game with completely fake AoA limit and fake G limit…not our fault you can’t figure out how to make it work.

Brought to you by one of the same geniuses that thinks notching in the game is too easy and needs to be made harder.

But apparently for anything that isn’t labeled EF.2000?

1 Like

Except he is right about the BOL. In game, it is modeled just as regular flares (but smaller) when they work completely different IRL. Almost every nation in game has a plane with BOL pods so I’m not sure where you get the idea that it would only buff the eurofighter. And notching is far too easy. But that would also affect every single plane in the game. So I’m really not sure where you get the idea that he thinks only the eurofighter needs a buff, and every other plane should be made harder.

BOL makes notching in the Eurofighter too hard. Buff BOL by a factor of 4.

But also notching is too easy so make the chaff-notch mechanic much much harder.

But also every Eurofighter radar needs to be buffed including the AESA version. Also the best flight model in the game needs to be buffed.

Not hard to see how all of the above would basically benefit the Eurofighter more than any other plane in the game.

People complain about dying to aim54/f-90 and people want notching to be made harder lol

BOL chaff is only slightly less effective then regular chaff, but it’s made up for by the fact that you have hundreds to spam willy-nilly. And BOL chaff is not the one modeled incorrectly (it is still just chaff). It is BOL flares that are modeled incorrectly. And like I said before, this would affect more than just 1 top tier plane. A lot of top tier planes in game, from almost every tech tree, get BOL pods.

Again, this would effect all planes in the game. Not just the Eurofighter.

Did you ever stop to think about the fact that maybe he advocates for buffs to the Eurofighter specifically, and doesn’t talk about other planes, because the Eurofighter is the plane he plays and enjoys the most? That’s exactly how I am with the F-15 and F-16. I play and enjoy those the most, so I advocate for buffs to them, and don’t really talk about other planes because I don’t really care about them that much.

And the Eurofighter FM is underperforming compared to IRL. At the very least, it’s missing a large portion of its thrust. Same as the F-15s.

Also most radars at top tier are underperforming. Including the CAPTOR-M radar on the mechanically scanned Eurofighters, and every single AESA radar in game. Top tier mechanically scanned and AESA radars are both far too easy to notch (notching a plane’s radar should be closer to how it is trying to notch a SAM’s radar in game), and all AESA radars have far too low scan speeds. It’s just barely faster than M-scan. So radar buffs would again, affect almost every top tier plane.

All these buffs (radar, BOL flares, and missile notching) would affect most top tier planes. The only one that would help the Eurofighter only is the FM buffs.

It’s almost as if those are 2 entirely different groups of people

To be fair, the Euro’s instructor is horrible
in rb it just has a major issue with wobbling when trying to manouver at 800km/h IAS-ish

I can see that getting fixed, more buffs wouldn’t be needed at all for gameplay purposes

1 Like

“The ramjet powers the missile to Mach 4 it has a range in excess of 200km.”

“This ‘ramjet’ motor provides the missile with thrust all the way to target intercept, providing the largest No Escape Zone of any air-to-air missile system, several times greater than current MRAAMs. The fragmentation warhead ensures maximum lethality.”

“MBDA also say that the no-escape zone of over 60 km is largest among air-to-air missiles.”

and to top this off your own source states “100+ km (60+ mi)” notice it says +.

1 Like

bu-bu-but those are marketing scams!!!

2 Likes