Major Update "Hornet Sting" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

Cough cough 5" radio fuse cough cough

But that doesn’t stop me from replying, after all this is a public thread is it not ?

I’m sure you’ve never heard of the saying to be quiet instead of saying senseless things to put it mildly, you’re the one trying to tell me something I read already, I’m asking why that decision was made and suggested a solution to the current problem of the vehicle’s inferiority, I don’t think anyone needs your unnecessary input

1 Like

When update launch top tier is gonna be absolute hell
Abrams will be way more fragile, as well as leopard

They need to be. Abrams and Leopard is way more survivable compared to T-90 and T-80s. A T-90 can only penetrate an Abrams in the driver optics after all. It’s for balance)))

My first top tier game after not playing for a while(12 hours)

Spoiler

1 Like

18 Likes

Yeah but what’s funny is I’m not even arguing, dude just assumed I didn’t read the message from Smin despite replying to it directly, apparently I shouldn’t ask any questions or make suggestions? Lol

What hes saying is that they are going to skip the MLU 1 and go straight for MLU 2. Which doesn’t fix the MLU 1 being the worst possible when MLU 1 could fix that problem entirely. Its literally a 400k rp sink for nothing essentially

1 Like

Sounds like theyre milking the 400K RP whilst giving you a worse version then the american one at the same br…

seems to be a trend this update

1 Like

EAP has a russian cousin wich will never be added either. 🤣🤣🤣
i-17

EAP


5 Likes

Be careful, or Tovarish Smin will bonk you

I’ve asked @Smin1080p_WT too, yet no reply.

1 Like

Maybe because historically these updates are always on the smaller side? Just because it’s on the leak list (it also said it was going to be delayed there btw) doesn’t mean it’s coming this update. Great example: A-6 SWIP.

Ah yes, we need an even better version of the current shared best jet in game.

I agree that we don’t need the 18E next update, but we surely also don’t need a new EFT next update either.

2 Likes

Nah, Russian cousin of EAP is Su-47, a proper flying lab instead of not realized combat aircraft (which 1.42/1.44 was and, arguably, still is)

2 Likes

I’m a really big fan of submarine and naval sims more generally, while they of course are used to interdict enemy surface groups, early WW2 submarines weren’t the most well suited for it. They could and did so effectively many times throughout the war, but the task they excelled at was interdicting sea lines of communication. That could be possible to implement in a combined Naval/Air EC on large maps with varied objectives like having to escort a supply convoy to a designated point, and heck I think using destroyers, frigates, and ASW aircraft could be fun under that circumstance. I wasn’t around when the submarine event happened, but I’m not sure with what I have played of WT naval it would work well. What I have played has been shallow water surface engagements, which is a problem since a submarine needs to be able to dive to effectively survive.

Hey. Our F/A-18A is from 1983-88, so it did not have AIM-7P. As such, it’s not planned to have this missile.

2 Likes

So why F/A-18A has 4 DL channels?

1 Like

Are there any plans to add it in the near future, perhaps in the next update?