AI controlled squadrons, can be banded together to make a stronger fighting force
WW2 carriers are fairly capable for self defense too
game needs SPAA to counter KH38s. This is absolutely ridiculous. Absolutely no reason for these to be in the game. Absolutely no reason for the ONLY nation to counter them to ONLY have them. Absolutely no reason for the Flarakrad being the best SPAA for Germany. Fix these in the next update. God almighty its so fkn dumb.
Then make its BR lower at 13.7, why even add the initial Hornet for Finland when they have 2 MLU iterations, the first MLU and a second MLU upgrade later on, doesn’t sound to me like all 3 will be added, so it’s only fair that it goes down a step given it’ll be 1 of the only if not the only 13.7+ jet without a HMD
They just said another is planned for later and the later one is being suggested
“We have a later MLU version coming in the future with many of the things mentioned”
“and suggested on a more modern version later.”
Carriers would probably just target each other first. Given how aircrafts has a much higher performance celling than other games, one player controlled dauntless can potentially disable a carrier
You don’t get it do you? I’m saying why didn’t they just go with the first MLU to begin with? Seems pointless to add this variant when it doesn’t match the American 18C or since we already are getting this pre MLU variant then make it a lower BR, without any air to ground munitions, without HMD for IRs and without a radar HMD it’s inferior to its American counterpart, HMD has become quite essential at top tier so at the very least lower its BR because this isn’t really 14.0 material
1 Like
I don’t think you realize how useful the tactic of immediately unlocking your radar after launching and only locking when the enemy has no chance to evade is. This is a very useful tactic with the R-27R already, not to mention the R-27ER. The latter is available at 12.3-12.7 but in far more limited quantities (2 to 4)
I do and it seems the RxR is just nothing more than a argument room
3 Likes
Yeah then you shouldn’t have replied, you’re clearly still clueless about the point being made here
Cough cough 5" radio fuse cough cough
But that doesn’t stop me from replying, after all this is a public thread is it not ?
I’m sure you’ve never heard of the saying to be quiet instead of saying senseless things to put it mildly, you’re the one trying to tell me something I read already, I’m asking why that decision was made and suggested a solution to the current problem of the vehicle’s inferiority, I don’t think anyone needs your unnecessary input
1 Like
When update launch top tier is gonna be absolute hell
Abrams will be way more fragile, as well as leopard
They need to be. Abrams and Leopard is way more survivable compared to T-90 and T-80s. A T-90 can only penetrate an Abrams in the driver optics after all. It’s for balance)))
Yeah but what’s funny is I’m not even arguing, dude just assumed I didn’t read the message from Smin despite replying to it directly, apparently I shouldn’t ask any questions or make suggestions? Lol
What hes saying is that they are going to skip the MLU 1 and go straight for MLU 2. Which doesn’t fix the MLU 1 being the worst possible when MLU 1 could fix that problem entirely. Its literally a 400k rp sink for nothing essentially
1 Like
Sounds like theyre milking the 400K RP whilst giving you a worse version then the american one at the same br…
seems to be a trend this update
1 Like
