Major Update "Hornet Sting" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

[Daft909]

F16 OCU gets stuff it didnt have, F-18 Finland doesnt get any fakes, and T.10 doesnt even get what it really had…

I REALLY wish there was another military sim for things like this…

[FlyingOstridge]

Opinions?

[Morvran]

Its BR is too high for US mains. Will need to be 12.3 to be competitive for them

[Pvt_Wade]

Missing AIM-4

[Pheonix_RX01]

Major Update "Hornet Sting" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

Please consider this a final warning. Your questions have been answered numerous times now. i understand you disagree. But spamming the topic continuously is not going to change the answers that have been provided.

Just read up, my argument is all there if you want to read it. Its a wste of time just fyi

[Rowiek]

@Smin1080p_WT

Is there a possibility that you can explain to why the F-2 isnt being implemented this update?
Since, its armament and radar are currently outdated in the current setting. With the AESA radar being implemented 3 updates before a possible addition of the F-2 (assuming it comes in April).

Also, the prototypes are already outdated by a long time; with some of them only being able to carry AAM-3 missles or worse, while also not having an AESA radar. So why has Gaijin chosen to NOT add these vehicles already?

[BearHasLanded]

@Daft909

F-18 Finland doesnt get any fakes

It’s not a fake, what we’re asking for is a real version of the Hornet that existed from 2006-2016, just without the AIM-9X as a balance measure

It would be exactly the same as the US one just without the ground attack weapons

[_Renzo]

Wait has it actually been confirmed that the Finnish one won’t get an HMD? damn

[hienapunk]

Y tho

[BearHasLanded]

@Smin1080p_WT could you comment on this thread, it’s pretty popular, we have over 400 votes for data

(POLL) AIM-9M for F/A-18C Early

The F/A-18C Early shown in game is a 1989 aircraft at the earliest, it is the version of the F/A-18C that was used during the Gulf War and as such should get the AIM-9 that was used during that period. Not only would this be historically accurate, it would also make the aircraft more appealing to buy as the AIM-9M is a much more competitive missile This change would also serve to differentiate it from the F/A-18A in the research tree as from how I understand it currently both aircraft are goin…

[Rowiek]

Why do the US and GB always receive so many vehicles per update…
Like, 4-5 on average.

There are nations who need the additions more then these already very good nations.

[BearHasLanded]

That is basically what we’ve been arguing for so it seems pretty confirmed

[Pheonix_RX01]

Yup

[gszabi99]

@FlyingOstridge

Opinions?

Obvious fake.

[Smin1080p_WT]

Its not currently planned to add AIM-9M. The aircraft will have AIM-9L + AIM-7P.

[Pheonix_RX01]

No HMD worked so well for the OCU that gaijin needed a part 2 electric boogaloo but at 14.0

[gszabi99]

@Rowiek

Probs the april update, at least… i’ve heard such things.

What April update?

[Rowiek]

Yeah, not april, i meant between april and june update. The summer one.
I’m not entirely trusting the info though. Something on the lines of Sherman pack or a russian t-34 three pack.
But that wont even be needed, so i dont really think that will happen

[_Renzo]

If it doesn’t get HMD it would be stupid to keep it at 14.0. Hell the Su-34 is 13.3 with almost a similar missile load. a HMDless 18C should at least be 13.7.

[quartas121]

Remove flare, limit to 9L, limit to AIM-7E-2, 11.7 or 11.3