I wouldnt be so sure, I think the R-24R and R-27ER have both proven just how good having IOG on a SARH missile can be. This definetly feels like a pay-to-win advantage
5 Likes
I need more cold war jets lol. So many masterpieces not ingame
1 Like
The F/A-18C early is everything I wanted the F/A-18A to be
You know what I want,
Spoiler
Food and a cuppa because I’m Hungry as it’s 3:00am lol
1 Like
This whole time
It’s also worth mentioning that with the right tactics, IOG can counter Multipathing
1 Like
Fixed : P
1 Like
yeah exactly, my stance on it is, at ww2 tier they would be boring and pretty useless, while at cold war tiers with things like SLASM and and wire guided torps they would be very infuriating to play against
1 Like
I know exactly how IOG and DL work on SARHs
I also will not be buying this thing because I have no need for it.
But as it stands with how strong the F-18s radar is at 12.7, plus the inexperienced players plaguing the BR. You’re really not gonna be breaking radar lock much at the ranges you’ll be using AIM-7s.
As for the R-27s, the main reason on the ER specifically you notice the effects of DL and IOG more compared to the 24R and 27R, is because the missiles goes so absurdly fast. IOG will only matter if the target continues on his course mostly unchanged within the few seconds after your radar loses lock, same for DL.
7Ps vs 7Ms really is not that big of an advantage-
Especially when both are leagues worse than the 27ER that already exists at that BR.
Ultimately while IOG/DL are improvements, the issue fundamentally lies in Sparrows themselves just being kinda… meh-
I am curious how gaijin would balance carriers, on one hand I could see them being very strong with it only taking a single 1000lb bomb to cripple a battleship, but at the same time due to AA being realistic airwings would be shredded by top tier BB with AA
being real, I’d give up any fantasy of naval balancing
They haven’t balanced that mode one bit in its existence. reason I refuse to play it.
AI controlled squadrons, can be banded together to make a stronger fighting force
WW2 carriers are fairly capable for self defense too
game needs SPAA to counter KH38s. This is absolutely ridiculous. Absolutely no reason for these to be in the game. Absolutely no reason for the ONLY nation to counter them to ONLY have them. Absolutely no reason for the Flarakrad being the best SPAA for Germany. Fix these in the next update. God almighty its so fkn dumb.
Then make its BR lower at 13.7, why even add the initial Hornet for Finland when they have 2 MLU iterations, the first MLU and a second MLU upgrade later on, doesn’t sound to me like all 3 will be added, so it’s only fair that it goes down a step given it’ll be 1 of the only if not the only 13.7+ jet without a HMD
They just said another is planned for later and the later one is being suggested
“We have a later MLU version coming in the future with many of the things mentioned”
“and suggested on a more modern version later.”
Carriers would probably just target each other first. Given how aircrafts has a much higher performance celling than other games, one player controlled dauntless can potentially disable a carrier
You don’t get it do you? I’m saying why didn’t they just go with the first MLU to begin with? Seems pointless to add this variant when it doesn’t match the American 18C or since we already are getting this pre MLU variant then make it a lower BR, without any air to ground munitions, without HMD for IRs and without a radar HMD it’s inferior to its American counterpart, HMD has become quite essential at top tier so at the very least lower its BR because this isn’t really 14.0 material
1 Like
I don’t think you realize how useful the tactic of immediately unlocking your radar after launching and only locking when the enemy has no chance to evade is. This is a very useful tactic with the R-27R already, not to mention the R-27ER. The latter is available at 12.3-12.7 but in far more limited quantities (2 to 4)
I do and it seems the RxR is just nothing more than a argument room
3 Likes
Yeah then you shouldn’t have replied, you’re clearly still clueless about the point being made here