Nope there are 14 Australian tech and only 1 in the US, you just making it worse by splitting nations.
You already spit the Canadians there no reason why Australia should too
1 Like
I mean, I still haven’t found those people that were apparently asking for India to be part of the British tree, but there supposedly were many of them.
I’ve seen people asking for Omani, Jordanian and even Kiwi (though the Kiwi ones could very well just have come from one “special” person) F-16s for the British tree, just like I’ve seen people asking for Argentinian and Polish F-16s for the German tree
Only the American stuff
if that the case then it would be pretty stupid since it wouldnt make the plane that much more OP + how else are you supposed to know that your plane can override the controls ? you need to threat the guys who made the plane to give you sekret docs ?
i mean in this case it’s a FRENCH RAFALE PILOT ( and btw he did a Rafale solo display so it’s not just a simple pilot ) with thousands of flight hours saying that . if they cant accept proof give by a pilot then they cant accept either proof verbaly gived by the enginesr who built the plane.
They just don’t accept this sort of thing as evidence. You could have a video of the head engineer saying it has a cobra button and they would still tag the report “not enough information”
This should actually be enough for it. So long as you can show that the switch let’s the pilot override any AoA limits it should be enough to get it added.
I stand corrected.
Canadian and Australian CITIZENS regularly ask to be put in the UK themselves because it’s a country they in fact are tied to historically. So them asking to be put their in game is not out of the question.
except, im not talking about them (can/aus citizens) here, if you wish to talk about them, go find someone else to talk to. And im not even saying putting can/aus into uk is out of the question, im saying the uk players asking for those country really dont have the right to as much as us/ru/ger players have no rights to ask for more additions solely for the fact their tree dont need any more additions.
Then complaining about any Indian additions to the UK tree is just dumb, because the nation is already confirmed to be part of the UK tree. No British mains aren’t “asking for the world” they’re asking for their closest related allies, which is what every nation main does.
I mean i dont even have to answer this part, there is already someone telling you they have legitimately asked for the whole world.
You wanna see asking for the world? Go talk to a German main who tries to claim everything ever produced by Rheinmetall even if it wasn’t produced for the German army.
annnnnnnnnnnd im not justifying for them. again to please the uk supporters here, i dont support us/ger/ru players asking for the whole world. but as much as i disagree they ask for the whole world, the very SAME logic applies to well…UK too. UK supporters try not to point to someone else when getting called out and use whataboutism challenge: impossible level
I have seen people claiming it so much that using the " its just a joke" seem like cheap way out of the argument at this point. but sure if you like to think its “a joke” so be it
You should make a report on this to get this added. A report for the Gripen was made and forwarded to the devs already and I’d imagine this would be accepted too.
Both British protectorates
used to for singooore, but british sucked at protecting singapore anyways
Not our fault we conquered 1/3 of the world. And that some nations exported their vehicles. Do you reckon we can claim the MiG-15 since they used a Rolls Royce Nene?
soooooooo you dont like us/ger/ru players asking for this and that for their already fleshed out tree, yet here we have uk players asking for this and that for their fleshed out tree. literally doing the very same thing that you hate the mains for lolol
@Smin1080p_WT
Can we please have MAJOR BR changes for naval. I shouldn’t see battleships in a 6.0 cruiser
I mean at this point this is a strawman argument. at least for me i dont condone us/ger/ru players asking for this and that or the whole world. WHy? because their tree doesnt need anymore help and its fleshed out plenty
FOR THE SAME REASON, i also DO not condone or agree uk players asking for the whole world as well. I hate the typical us/ger/ru main doing that. For me to not agree to uk players asking this country or that country is just extension of the same logic here. literally fair.
At least when us mains ask for more additions they mostly ask for their own domestic stuff, mostly
4 Likes
I just want the Gnat and the Hawk… :(
1 Like
I wonder why, not like they were a British colony and part of the CoN or anything
they were, but then japan happened. Japan took SEA in ww2 by force, by that logic should japan players say : “SEA countries should be in japan tree”?
not to insult, but uk sucked so bad in protecting singapore and that region, Brits didnt even win anything against the japanese as far as that region is concerned
1 Like
With the recent addition of the PL-8B to dev server, do you think that Python-4 should be added under the same treatment that PL-8B recived?
- Add it with Gatewidth IRCCM only (R-73, Magic-2, PL-5E-II, R-27T, etc)
- Add it with Tracking suspension only (9M, AAM-3, 9L/I, etc)
- Do not add it
0
voters
7 Likes
Reports can be made with evidence for any aircraft that do not have the feature, as we explained. However video statements are generally not accepted.
2 Likes
I mean it’s litteraly who have more hour on a plane ans on simulator than on his car that is saying that so…
1 Like
Are reports allowed to be made about missing weapons?
Wait it depends. How much can it pull and can it 180?