Major Update "Hornet Sting" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

mmW Brimstones would be too strong, especially when you can bring a load of 15 or even 18 of them.
ATGMs with the ability to track through smoke should be a no-go right now.

Someone said that it uses same transmission as the PGZ04

Isn’t it usually: “tell me this meme is false with a straight face”?

Because telling you it’s true with a straight face is a lot easier than telling you it’s false with a straight face.

I never denied that Canadians and Australians want their own vehicles in the British tree, I just pointed out (besides general Bri’ish skill issue) that the problem is a group of British mains trying to claim pretty much every other commonwealth nation.

From my understanding AOA limit button does same thing as full-real - however full-real doesn’t enable the TVC like the new button does. Would need to test

Tbh the issue there is its kinda led to everyone thinking you mean all of us, which simply isnt true, personally id avoid the russian stuff, but stuff like the aussie hornet, when i say that for Britain im talking on behalf of some friends who agree there, not my own personal bias, only thing i want in Britain now is a revenge class battleship

actualy that wrong …
At least on the rafale , idk for the eurofighter but i can send a video made by an old rafale pilot explaining the cockpit of the rafale and we can clearly hear him saying at 6:08 " this is the switch when you get into a flatspin ( une Vrille in french ) that make you able to overide the limit of the electronical commands "
basicly it’s giving you the full control of your plane using all surfaces available without any limit ( exactly like the F18 and SU familly that are currentyl having the AOA limit remover in game )
so if gaijin dont want to add the AOA remover for at least the rafale it’s clearly not a question of realisim …
image

you can watch the entire video cause it’s pretty interesting but the moment we want there is at 6:08

5 Likes

I’ve never seen it worse than German mains though, for a while there was a thread devoted to finding a way to shoehorn an f16 into Germany.

2 Likes

There were also plenty of people trying to find a way to shoehorn a F-16 into the British tree

They probably won’t accept that as evidence.

I don’t think I ever saw that

Australian vehicles post WW2 should be in the US tree

Nope there are 14 Australian tech and only 1 in the US, you just making it worse by splitting nations.
You already spit the Canadians there no reason why Australia should too

1 Like

I mean, I still haven’t found those people that were apparently asking for India to be part of the British tree, but there supposedly were many of them.

I’ve seen people asking for Omani, Jordanian and even Kiwi (though the Kiwi ones could very well just have come from one “special” person) F-16s for the British tree, just like I’ve seen people asking for Argentinian and Polish F-16s for the German tree

Only the American stuff

if that the case then it would be pretty stupid since it wouldnt make the plane that much more OP + how else are you supposed to know that your plane can override the controls ? you need to threat the guys who made the plane to give you sekret docs ?
i mean in this case it’s a FRENCH RAFALE PILOT ( and btw he did a Rafale solo display so it’s not just a simple pilot ) with thousands of flight hours saying that . if they cant accept proof give by a pilot then they cant accept either proof verbaly gived by the enginesr who built the plane.

They just don’t accept this sort of thing as evidence. You could have a video of the head engineer saying it has a cobra button and they would still tag the report “not enough information”

@actualsize123

This should actually be enough for it. So long as you can show that the switch let’s the pilot override any AoA limits it should be enough to get it added.

I stand corrected.

Canadian and Australian CITIZENS regularly ask to be put in the UK themselves because it’s a country they in fact are tied to historically. So them asking to be put their in game is not out of the question.

except, im not talking about them (can/aus citizens) here, if you wish to talk about them, go find someone else to talk to. And im not even saying putting can/aus into uk is out of the question, im saying the uk players asking for those country really dont have the right to as much as us/ru/ger players have no rights to ask for more additions solely for the fact their tree dont need any more additions.

Then complaining about any Indian additions to the UK tree is just dumb, because the nation is already confirmed to be part of the UK tree. No British mains aren’t “asking for the world” they’re asking for their closest related allies, which is what every nation main does.

I mean i dont even have to answer this part, there is already someone telling you they have legitimately asked for the whole world.

You wanna see asking for the world? Go talk to a German main who tries to claim everything ever produced by Rheinmetall even if it wasn’t produced for the German army.

annnnnnnnnnnd im not justifying for them. again to please the uk supporters here, i dont support us/ger/ru players asking for the whole world. but as much as i disagree they ask for the whole world, the very SAME logic applies to well…UK too. UK supporters try not to point to someone else when getting called out and use whataboutism challenge: impossible level

I have seen people claiming it so much that using the " its just a joke" seem like cheap way out of the argument at this point. but sure if you like to think its “a joke” so be it