I can understand JA37 and J-8 but ICE is just bs it shouldnt go below 13.3
upsetting both sides thats the way
1 Like
yeah, I was excited for the update but finding out that the weapons that were meant to make the Gr4 really good are gimmick weapons and the biggest thing is the PGMs being the best weapons and the closest thing the UK has to the KH38MT
1 Like
What evaluation only stuff is there for …Finland?
Tbh, whilst it’s wouldn’t be the perfect implementation, i’ll still be happy playing Ra’am as is.
Creating GBU-39 swarms looks like hilarious fun.
I want Spice or Popeye
4 Likes
Don’t get me wrong, I really do too, but what are getting still looks fun enough.
Ra’am is going to be the absolute pinnacle of this air tree for years to come, and I look forward (maybe with a bit of copium) to the snail adding more domestic stuff to it retrospectively as the meta moves forth.
I was worried we would have to wait until december patch to get it with it not being in any of the leaks, so just getting it in the game at all at this point is a W in my eyes.
1 Like
i clearly said vehicle wise now didnt i
I doubt it when it has a max range of 70km+
13.0 is a bit low yes, but is it not extremely similar or nearly identical in comparison to the JA-37Di coming in at 13.0? I would personally place them both at 13.3 if we could have some more decompression to 14.0, given the two major downsides of no HMD/HMS (no slaving IR missiles and no HMD radar locks) and no IRCCM IR guided missiles (cough one flare IT missiles at top tier where everyone has loads of CMs and BOL) would be considered worthy of two steps down from top tier. In its current state, it’s a 12.3 plane based on its capabilities, given it’s a budget F-16ADF at the same BR when it should be lower. Based on the examples we have ingame, adding ARH to an aircraft usually results in a 2 step (.7) BR increase, which would result in 13.3 in its current state, or 13.0 if it were at 12.3 where it belonged.
1 Like
a 13.3 with that rwr would… be rather painful
In my opinion, maybe Kfir 2000 because prototype is essentially the early variant of the Kfir C.10
But I had a hunch that would be 13.7
1 Like
I mean its only 2 missiles at the end and Gaijin could chose from TV or IIR seekers
the AGM-142 have 70km+ of range using man in the loop feature, with just the IR guidance that can be used in terminal phase is going to have a similar launch range as the KH-38MT soo… nothing crazy.
3 Likes
and also you are going to sacrifice 2 missile in each wing soo… you are going to just carry amraams under the fuselage thats a huge gap for self-defense.
1 Like
ahh that’s right, the J37Di doesn’t get a digital RWR does it, I’ll have to check when I get the chance.
Same old C.7 airframe, only has 4 air to air missiles, and retains the low CM count. 13.3 at minimum.
Viggen and F-4F have similar flight performance but F-4F gets better radar, incomparably better RWR and 2 more Sidewinders which are Li model over regular L on the Viggen. F-4F is simply better suited for uptiers so 13.0 doesnt make sense for it and should stay 13.3
1 Like
same ol insufferable viggen rwr the others get xD
1 Like