Not in War Thunder. Inefficient doesn’t matter anything in the game.
Combat range is much closer than what USN and IJN anticipated(and similar to what Royal Navy and Kriegsmarine anticipated) when designing battleships. Bismarck’s gun will be enough to penetrate Iowa’s main armour and blow out magazine just below the waterline at 10 km. Yamato would be better, but definitely not impenetratable.
I wonder if Gaijin covers Smin’s bills for his EAPTSD.
EAP confirmed?!!/???!11!
But jokes aside, civilian aircraft with weapons…AC-208 when? (I flew the normal version irl and would love to fly it in WT with some pew pew)
A bayonet would be more armament than the EAP ever had.
F-35 wouldnt be 11.3. It has no radar and carries only 2 A2A missiles
JA37 early is more or less what AJS37 offers in the techtree
Mmmm… its British, so naturally it carries a great many pointy edged objects…
Anyway, another thread blessed bois, back to relevant topics.
Watch people mistake the subject of discussion for the wrong F-35
@Smin1080p_WT ive noticed that the controllable hangar guy can retain a lot of momentum when sprinting and then jumping constantly.
Did the devs give us Bhopping? (pls tutorial)
Oh no, its another episode of Thunder Wars: EAP Strikes Back!
Or J7G I suppose.
According to a book published by AVIC (to be specific, Aviation Industry Press), it is improved from 7E and equipped with a small PD radar & HMD.
But the loadout remain unclear, at least not mentioned in the book.
Another Choice is the FTC200G (JL-9 variant), which is also, a J-7 but highly modified, dual seat, moving air inlet to the side. Using WP13F(C) as engine, PD radar and, ability to use SD10A and PL5EII.
It also has thermal pod as well as A2G ability.
I don’t know, it causes me emotional damage every time it’s mentioned. So it’s got some firepower.
Yes its an abysmally wasteful design (though any ship is better than no ship), but that’s not relevant in WT.
It has high pen, the fastest reload of any large calibre naval cannon, its fast, has very good gun handling, and it possesses the singular most busted armour scheme possible, despite it being ahistorically good but that’s not the issue.
So it and its sucessor H-39/40 will be more than capable of drastically overperforming.
It also doesn’t help that she’s 7,000 tonnes heavier than any of her direct equivalents meaning all ships designed to compete with her are at an inherent disadvantage.
He’s been hitting the gym hard since last year ready to walk around the hanger again thousands of times.
@Smin1080p_WT Is there any report made about HMS Repulse’s number of hydroplane?
Currently it is only one, with no plane on hangar. It should be three(two in hangar, one in catapult) to four(two in hangar, one in catapult and one in deck).
Psychological warfare aircraft.
I don’t think there is a report in for it, though there are several reports in what I assume is Russian so I haven’t gone through all of them.
I think the best and easy way to fill gaps for Sweden in top tier air would be to:
introduce F-35 in the attacker line before AJ37
add JA37D (late) or JA37Di armed with RB99 in a folder with JA37D
add JAS39A (early) limited to RB74, Skyflash, unguided A2G and no BOL rails in a folder with regular JAS39A
introduce J35J (with CM pods) in a folder with or after J35D
