And? Still a sub-sonic with the worst performing all-aspect missile in the game currently. Gets completely slaughtered at the moment in ARB due to being at 11.7.
You can always make a suggestion or add feedback in BR decompression.
Soviets don’t have Strv 122, TOR-M1, Tiger UHT, 9.12 Mig-29, or USS Alaska.
All among the best in their respective categories. And F-16 is still on-par with Mig-29.
T-80BVM isn’t even top 3 MBTs. ERs are no more “OP” than Aim-7Fs.
@Smoak741
F-14B is not the best. F-16 & Mig-29 are.
Pantsir is inferior to TOR-M1.
1 Like
So could you. But no chance in hell they drop an aircraft from 11.3 down to 10.3 instantly. at most it “MIGHT” go down to 11.0. But if the R-73s get buffed through the roof, could even end up next to the Gr7 at 11.7
That is my plan :)
That I disagree on. Being around 30% faster. They win engagements more often; In all other respects they are about equal. But that 1 difference, is gives them a major advantage.
If one of these comes round the corner, I consider it a fair fight. if a T-80BVM comes around the corner, Im probably dead
Kronstadht is still superior. Its close, but its better. Even still, Alaska is new in comparison, for a very long time. It was Kron 100%
1 Like
See on the su-17m2 how long it was at 11.0 and only after how long did they give it to 10.3 …
If either come around the corner, idler wheel kills both BVM & Strv.
Alaska has a superior armor array to Kron.
1 Like
It didnt have R-73s or Vikhrs.
Kron has the better shells and shell dispersal.
take the tiger uht out, it is not the strongest helicopter, it is very situational and only useful on desert or artic maps, any bush breaks the lock and the pars 3 destroys itself. Other helis like KA 52 are way more reliable
2 Likes
No, just no.
You think it would be fair for 10.0 ground and 10.0 SPAA to face it?
It`s fine where it is as its a ground attacker.
So deal with it
1 Like
“Pantsir is inferior to TOR-M1.”
What??
“T-80BVM isn’t even top 3 MBTs.”
Ahahahahahahaha
2 Likes
Top 3 MBTs in capabilities: Strv 122, M1A2 SEP, and Type 99A.
TOR-M1 can hit targets, Pantsir can only hit slow moving targets as of current.
Sparrows don’t even hold a candle to 27ERs
If 27ER is fired on target at range lower than 5km, the kill is guaranteed due to speed of R27ER1
You can always fly close to the ground then it’s a wasted missile.
The F-14B can carry 6 sparrows and still have room for the Aim-9L
1 Like
That’s generally the tactic against any PD radar
IMO, MiG-29 requires more patience than F-14 since with latter you can sling missiles any way you want. With MiG-29, you don’t have that luxury and you have to be more careful with your shots.
You can always fly close to the ground. Aim-7F and SkyFlash are suppose to work at low alts, but Gaijin artificially nerfed them so they are on a level playing field to R-27ER. Aim-9Ls were good, but they nerfed those as well. R-60Ms are far more reliable these days
The R-27R/ER can fly at a low minimum distance of 20m. All radar missiles are nerfed and set to 100m iirc.
Aim-9L is still 2x better than R-60M and more reliable
Disinformation.
This has never happened.
Aim-7F has never been reduced in performance.
And Aim-9Ls weren’t “nerfed” either, and are still more flare resistant than most IR missiles.
9Ls had their on-rail FOV corrected, that’s it.
1 Like