Thats nothing compared to a Steam account that owns 15K games)))
1 Like
Fax!
what even is this discussion about? This not on topic anymore considering the topic is the leak list
1 Like
I mean it doesn’t matter you’re saying because i play ground less it doesn’t count but you play the game less so i can just say anything you say doesn’t count, cant be a hypocrite can we
This is why i cant respect people that play only one nation
I mean you barely have a better k/d than what i had when i was lv 14 in the Tiger II
It lasts for 40s and spawns 4km away from the battlefield its a SPAAs wet dream
perform poorly
Yeah right… you’re also acting like it doesn’t take one cap and dying to spawn a plane with a full CAS loadout
Funny you say this yet ive barely played any games in the M247 and have a 4.6 k/d mind you once i get the proxy shells it’d probably jump much higher granted i cant stand playing one vehicle long enough to have a significant amount of games in it
1 Like
Thanks that gaslighter that loves mocking people and going off-rail to prove 0 points
Report his posts for being either inappropriate or off-topic so that they get hidden and the topic can return on its tracks
You’re admitting to abusing the report system
2 Likes
Gosh, could you beta kiddies take your rizz comparisons to PM, becuz you really ain’t mewing on this thread.
1 Like
5 Likes
touhou isnt an anime but alright
1 Like
How come there’s no new LAV variants? The BFV chassis is good and all but it sucks. And it’s about time we have a new A-10, meanwhile russia has 87 Su-25s.
It’s still Animated bruh
Its a game bruh
1 Like
Because huuuuuuuuuuh, here’s your third Shilka variant instead! And another SPAA that will be added to 3 different tech trees!
Copy-paste is the key,when they’ll be added,thet’ll be DoA
i dont think its a final list
france should get something and they cant add an iconic plane like the F/A-18C without adding it for the main nation which is USA
also having the C variant before the A variant they should ad F/A-18A for usa before the C
Thwy are getting stuff…
Its called naval
1 Like
https://www.parlament.ch/de/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/geschaeft?AffairId=19943203
Swiss parliamentary question to the federal council(government)
Is it really the case that the Hornet F/A-18 aircraft are not suitable for conversion to the Maverick system?
The integration of Maverick guided missiles into the F/A-18 fighter aircraft to be procured would be technically possible, but would entail high costs. It should be borne in mind that these missiles would no longer meet the operational requirements. The decisive factor, however, is that the 34 F/A-18s to be procured are an absolute minimum for fulfilling the most important tasks of the air force (maintaining air sovereignty, air defense); their simultaneous use for ground combat would lead to an unwelcome fragmentation of forces.
Such bombing raids are unthinkable for the Swiss army. At least until today. When the last Hunter fighter-bombers were decommissioned in 1994, the army lost its “ground combat capability” - the ability to bomb targets on the ground. Switzerland uses the F/A-18 fighter jets procured at that time and still in service today purely as interceptors. After the end of the Cold War and the respectable success of the “Stop F/A-18” initiative at the ballot box in 1993 (43% in favor), neutral Switzerland saw no need to equip itself with bombs.
Report from a Swiss newspaper about switzerland getting the capability for A2G combat again for the first time since 1994.
The fact that Swiss F/A-18C are not capable of A2G is unequivocally correct.
We’ve had this discussion for multiple days already in the rumor roundup thread.
4 Likes
Yes, they can’t do CAS because they don’t have ordnance for it. The topic we had discussed here however pertained whether they are capable of performing CAS duties if proper equipment is provided or not.
Then Swiss F-18 should have access to all Ground ordinance.
Considering SAAF Gripen uses AGM-65G,R-Darter and Aim-9M (despite it never used them irl) i dont see any reason why Swiss F-18 shouldnt be.
No. No it can not. Simple.
as you can clearly see from the government response:
Mavericks in this example are not integrated into the Plane. It would take Money, Time and Effort from the Manufacturer to make Mavericks available on the Plane.
If Germany were to give Switzerland Mavericks then Switzerland could do absolutely nothing with them because the Swiss F/A-18 are not capable of using Mavericks.
Switzerland would have to send the planes over to the US to get them upgraded/integrated by Boeing before they could be used for A2G
3 Likes
man if you keep the systems to do ground attack it can if you dont have the bombs for it you still have the capacities there but not the weapons for it as simple as that