In a fair number of cases, I really think that A2A only weaponry and air belts should reduce SP cost for aircraft. Maybe even change it so scout bonus is larger for a plane loaded to kill planes, and not tanks. It’s also still absurd that air belts incur the same SP penalty as anti-ground/HVAP belts for aircraft. That definitely should be fixed.
1 Like
Just take the damn planes out of the game in GRB or leave them alone ,no middle ground.
Have one GRB with planes one without simple.
If you accept this game as having CAS then why do you want to nerf it ? All you guys telling us how CAS is needed and how we should all play WoT if we dont like CAS then you go on about how to nerf CAS because it ruins the game.Make your mind up.
Lets have the TO game as suggested a million times.
3 Likes
Nah, it is better to not have TO and then cry about air being nerfed because of unbalance.
2 Likes
Wanting alteration does not equal a “nerf”, nor does rebalancing and changes. Evolution is a positive and not a negative.
Wanting changes has nothing to do with asking for new modes. People for change does not equal support for new modes.
Topics on new modes has nothing to do with a rebalance topic; derailment helping no one.
Those asking for alterations are not Gaijin. Those saying no to a new mode are Gaijin.
Too much false equivalence is very unhelpful.
So are people helping or hindering? It is relatively clear who is hindering as per above points made.
The belief players = Gaijin is idiotic.
A perfect example of being against change, as argued before, in the above comments prior to mine.
@ULQ_LOVER you asked before to show when you have been against change, see your comment above.
Sarcastic comment talking about a parcitular forum user who has said many times that he doesn’t want TO because of how air weapons were nerfed is now me being against any change?
lmao.
[That is not me is it and never been my stance. Since I am not against TO but against how it is being handled.] - ignore, I misread. But keep to show my mistake in understanding you admitting trolling a certain member. Fortunately there are thousands of members.
However:
If you want to discuss a new mode in telation to Tank Only.
The problem TO has now is that what momentum it used to have (the peak was probably around 2019, maybe 2020 when everyone was cooped up) has now subsided. Sure, there is interest…but it’s not at its zenith and even that appears to have not stirred Gaijin to act.
TO advocates ought to try reapproaching Gaijin over the trigger queue ideas or that perma-event approach Gaijin themselves broached in late 2019. Try that and see if you get headway…
And I have never said it is about You.
It is not trolling.
It just shows that in hatred some people don’t understand how certain things will lead to others.
Eddie actually has approached Gaijin but no update yet (that I noticed).
Keep reading I already covered this.
You have actually admitted to actively trolling another on purpose.
Again.
It is not trolling, just pointing out how certain things will lead to another.
Best not to admit openly a comment was made to target a specific member in an offtopic way to mock; it is called trolling.
And supporting comments being against change then making such a “sarcastic” comment is very much “against change”.
Again, use the right topic and avoiding admitting you are trolling.
The fact that Gaijin has visibly backed off the matter of TO in previous years does not bode well for it.
Wrong or right, I suspect that when TO advocates shunned Gaijin’s 2019 proposal it really soured Gaijin on the whole matter. They’ve been known to be ‘stubborn’ (we’ll call it) before in similar scenarios.
The general lack of serious, substantive discussion on the topic hasn’t helped either–but I know there has been at least some progress on that recently.
1 Like
Still it is not me being against a change per se.
As I have said many times I’m only against changes that won’t provide results.
People keep trying to turn this into a new mode discussion that already exists is rather telling, maybe?
Good points.
Well the old forum was murdered so that kind of had an impact.This thread rumbles on and new threads made and removed ad infinitum.
I came in on side of TO as a non flying CAS hater a long time ago and now I am on the side of TO as a flying CAS user who does not want any negative changes to CAS.
I Just like and accept the game as it is in the BR that I play at.Quite a positive stance I think.
Not sure if this what you mean but I have approached TO as a formal suggestion and I have had no reply.
As I see it those who hate CAS in GRB and those who want to preserve CAS GRB as it is should be working together and making approaches to Gaijin.
If you don’t both parties may end up with some horrible half way house attempt to
appease all and ending up offending everybody. I see there is much to suggest this could happen.
I see the Forum manager Smin has been stepping up lately and giving as much official insight on these forums as he or she can and it really does seem to be appreciated so even if a call for TO does nothing more then get an official no then that would be something.
What it is is there’s a common problem (CAS being too powerful) where one party is made up of extremists who want CAS removed altogether and nothing else, whilst the other party believes that CAS should stay in, but receive balance changes.
The extremists refuse to settle and derail actual CAS balance threads spamming them with “remove CAS!!!” and “add TO ONLY!!!”. Gajin sees this division and knows they don’t actualy needa do anything and just continue to sell OP premium packs.
1 Like
Then the pettiness needs to stop for the good of all.Nothing makes the devs switch off quicker then seeing a discussion turn into a childish shit slinging match.
And those guys are usually idiots.
They play RB with their silly mouse aim and then wonder if planes get more of an advantage out of it than tanks.
So even with realistic weapons the planes will overperform.
The issue is that weapon damage is global and such a change will affect every player not just the mouse aim scrubs, it will ruin other parts of WT.
RB GF is far from being popular enough to merit global changes on the behalf of RB.
It’s the “i am so important, everyone needs to bow to me” solution.
Nah… Keep everything realistic. If the RB players need crutches they should deal with the consequences of them, instead of making other players deal with their poor decisions.
1 Like
I actually agree.Air superiority is key in warfare and Allied air power vs Germany’s lack of was key.
If the enemy have planes and you don’t its bad news.It is meant to be.
1 Like