I propose lowering the combat rating of the Abrams

It’s not

Only flanking,which surprise surprise every tank with a hint of speed can do that

A light tank with 97/13 kph of mobility is classed as “bad”. Nice ragebait

It’s countered by the lack of protection,since the cheeks can’t tank those rounds

Because at 9.0+ you get sniping maps,maps in which flanking is not possible or easily achievable. The 2A4 can both flank and snipe without issues

It does not now,unless they use HE,in that case you get overpressured, but it’s something that can be avoided

The Stryker has better mobility,at least regarding forward speed

M774 is way worse than the other ammo at the BR. M833 is still worse but is more competitive. It would still literally have the worst ammo for a MBT at the BR AFAIK.

1 Like


I propose to lower the Ariete to 5.7

8 Likes


Better, move the Ariete to 2.7

11 Likes

I was talking about metrics like mobility gun handling reload speed gun depression…

Check HP/t and then come back.
It’s probably one of the slowest vehicles at BR.

2A4 has worse armor than M1. Cheeks can take DM23.

So can M1.

1 Like

You still haven’t answered my question.
That dude isn’t asking for M833, he wants M900.

1 Like

Then most of the 12.0 vehicle gonna reduce BR to 10.0, because their armour can’t hold the 152mm APFSDS 🤣🤣🤣

5 Likes

Ok so deny M900 and say M833 is an acceptable buff, it does not matter.

So how about we locate every tank’s weakest point and buff it, just for reasons. Doesn’t make sense to do so though.

T-tanks have worst gun handling, let’s just buff it slightly, shall we?

2 Likes

What are you even talking about

2A4 has similar handling

2A4 has same depression

Doesn’t matter,it still has a better speed than the Abrams since well, it’s a light tank. 18.7 hp/t vs. 27.3 is not a huge difference,in fact.

The Abrams’ cheeks have between 380 and 400mm of protection against KE,the 2A4 has between 420 to 800

At this point,i’m thinking you don’t know what you are talking about

Tell me if you’re able to snipe a 11.7 on the front from 900+ metres with 774,i’m curious

You want to buff M1s ammo because it’s the worst at it’s tier.
Same could be said for gun handling of T-tanks, so why not buff that as well?

2 Likes

Do you even play the game ?

Check again.
2A4 can eat M774 as easily as M1 can eat DM23.

Yes, so can you.

3 Likes

I want to buff the m1’s ammo because the m1, despite people overrating the shit out of it, is not actually as good as ppl think. It just needs more competitive ammo to fix this. M833 is not even going to change how it compares to other tanks…

1 Like

No sorry i only play the game since 2015 and have almost any Abrams as well as the Stryker :(

😐😐😐
Since when, exactly? And don’t ask me to check Protection Analysis,since it is not a proper tool to use

You can’t

11.7 tanks have over 500mm+ of KE protection,and people are smart enough to hide their weakspot.

At around 1km,the M774 pens 350mm point blank,so tell me:when will you stop lying?

Don’t tell me you think M1 suffers at 10.7 ?

Slightly buffing gun handling of T-tanks wouldn’t either, but you don’t see me supporting it.

1 Like

You are comparing the best conventional kinetic penetrator in the game (that only one currently hard to obtain tank is equipped with) to the Abrams. If you were being fair you would use that same shell against soviet vehicles or even more fair just use 3bm42 as that is the Soviet standard at 10.0, not the object 292’s apfsds.

8 Likes

Then you would know that 18 vs 27 HP/t is night and day when it comes to mobility. Light vehicle with 18 HP/t is crazy slow at that BR.

Since it was checked in another M1 suffers thread.

Good to know buddy. That’s why my 11.7 Challenger 2 got OHK’d by getting shot with M774 in the mantlet.

2 Likes

What post?how it was checked? Mentioning it is silly,you either bring the proof or it’s something that didn’t happen

What part did it hit?were you injured before?where on the armor did the round hit?

There’s no fucking way. Firstly you use the Object 292 against a Abrams to justify your argument, then you use the M1 Abrams against a T-72B (1989) to reinforce the “armor inbalance” in the game. At this point I’m sure most US mains are smooth brained.

This is how it should looks like if you didn’t biased all your arguments; thus:

Even not showing at all, Object 292 can still pen the upper frontal plate;

9 Likes