I have been thinking about different ways in which Australia (and by extension, New Zealand, since they are a package deal) could come to the game. Please note this thread is NOT about whether you want Australia in the game, or if Gaijin should add it, it is about how you would do it if you were going to.
I have created a poll for some sensible ways it could be added, and below I will write out some of my reasoning. I am curious to hear the opinions of others and see how people vote.
- Together with Canada in a new tech tree
- Part of a new Pacific Nations tech tree with Indonesia, Philippines etc.
- A sub tree for Israel it so sorely needs
- Another sub tree for Great Britain
- Other (please comment)
Why choose Canada?
Canada and Australia are two of the largest British colonies (both originally part of the British Empire and both still part of the Commonwealth today) in terms of available content to offer War Thunder. It could be argued either one has too much to fit in the current Great Britain tree, and it could also be argued neither one has solid foundations for an independent tree. But together they can build a very healthy tech tree.
There is also historical precedent for the sharing of military tech between Canada and Australia.
https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/canada/canada-country-brief
Why choose a Pacific Nations alliance?
Not just a happenstance of geography, Australia has pretty good relations with all our neighbors, the largest contributors to a War Thunder tech tree being probably Indonesia and the Philippines. Cooperation on defence goes back to at least WW2 and continues today. And perhaps a major update with the introduction of a Pacific Nations tech tree could also bring with it additional Pacific Theatre WW2 content like maps etc.
There is historical precedent as well for Indonesia and Philippines purchasing Australian military hardware (CAC Sabres and naval vessels come to mind).
https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/indonesia/indonesia-country-brief
https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/philippines/philippines-country-brief
Why choose Australia as a sub tree for Israel?
This one of the options makes the least sense in terms of real world politics, but maybe the most sense in terms of what the game “needs” right now. Most people will agree Israel as a nation in War Thunder could use help, and most of the nations that could give it (USA, France for example) already have their own independent trees. Enter Australia, with strong WW2 content to offer not only does it help fill out Israel’s non-existent earlier ranks, but it healthily bolsters the later ranks as well.
Australia might not have obvious real world strong ties with Israel, but they are on friendly terms nonetheless and have some cooperation on defence projects (I know for one, an Israeli company is developing the armour package for the AS9 Huntsman). Australia also operates the Israeli Spike missiles for what it’s worth.
https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/israel/israel-country-brief
Why make Australia another sub tree for Great Britain?
Well, plain and simple, Australia was founded as a British colony, and is still part of the Commonwealth today. If Gaijin wanted to bring in bulk Australian content via a new sub tree, Great Britain makes the most political sense. Except Great Britain already has a healthy 5 line tech tree in War Thunder, so Australia would almost need to employ the “alternate tab” tree idea, i.e. giving Great Britain 2 air trees, 2 ground trees etc.
Not only does the game not need this, it practically begs for alternate tab trees becoming a thing. The mechanics exist for it, it’s basically the same idea as having a ground and a heli tree, where you can research helis with ground vehicles.
https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/united-kingdom/united-kingdom-country-brief
Bonus round, why a Commonwealth Tech Tree is a bad idea
So this idea of a Commonwealth Tech Tree gets bandied around quite a bit, and here’s why it doesn’t work. There are currently 56 nations of the Commonwealth of Nations! Minus England and South Africa since they are already in game and part of a tech tree, that still leaves 54 nations including the likes of Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Singapore to name a few major content contributors. There is almost zero chance that any of them would see decent representation in such a crowded house.
For one last mention, I will link my own suggestion posts for Australian sub trees I have made so far, so anyone reading can get at least an idea of what type of content Australia would be bringing.
Aviation Tree
Helicopter Tree