AIM-54 arent AMRAAMs or AMRAAM counterparts
They are ARH.
Muhaha
and? thats not what i said
AMRAAM can actually turn
Sustaining 6-7 G and out accelerating the F-15C while slinging AMRAAMs against 3rd gens. Yes please.
at low speed maybe
F-14A firing 6x Aim-54s more than likely equals Sea Harrier FA2 firing 4x AMRAAM.
Especially when all the other limitations of the FA2 are factored in like no gun or IR missiles with that 4x AMRAAM config.
As I said, there is a reasonable argument for the FA2 to be 12.7 at the moment.
Up until about 500-600 mph lol.
a 14.0 jet with 10 120s wanting to be lowered? nah that should stay up there unless its a reasonable br lowering
thats low speed for an F-15
Yes this is known.
Personally, F/A-18C Early change to 13.0 and receive AIM-9M
Hopefully after this major update gajin decompression BR to 14.3 before AIM-120B replace with AIM-120C-3 or AIM-120C-4, add AIM-9X (Blk 1) and AIM-120C-5 on F/A-18C Late
But F/A-18A reduce BR 12.7 → 12.3 or stay 12.7 ?
Speed - is the key on top tier.
but SHar gets AIM-9M
F-14A has AIM-9H, and should have AIM-9L
yall do not need a 120 upgrade right now
Su-34 have better top speed and also same amount of missiles (+/-) and also best dogfight missile in the game. But sits on 13.3 somehow🤷♂️
And how 9M would help?
su34 is more of a ground combat aircraft than being air to air combat yea it has r77s but there not good at long range bvr unlike the 120
To run Aim-9M, the FA2 loses AMRAAMs.
Also the A-10C has Aim-9M at 11.7, so I dont see the issue of the FA2 having 9Ms at 12.7
FA2 has 4 hard points, 1 on each wing, 2 on the belly.
the wing mounts can either have
1x AMRAAM + BOL
1x Aim-9M + BOL
2x Aim-9M
the belly mounts can have
1x AMRAAM
1x 30mm ADEN Gunpod
So by adding Aim-9Ms you are reducing the amount of AMRAAMs and thus reducing the reason for it to be at 13.0 even more.
I really dont see any problem to set 29G on 12.3 since we already have Bison with just 2 less missiles. But clearly not 13.0. 12.7 would be compromise.