A) real world definitions of words and their meanings
B) gaijin’s interpretation of them
So it doesn’t matter what a game provider defines as “primary source” for his artificial world - the real world defines the meaning.
So if a fellow player cites gaijin as a reply to the generic definition of “primary source” he is objectively wrong in an irl context, that’s why it is nonsense trying to argue with me - and i ask them to stop this.
Every player can express his view on things, but if some guys try to create something similar to a “smart-ass” contest i will always respond in an appropriate manner if they quote me, otherwise idc.
I have zero issues with guys like you posting their opinions - even if they are flat wrong like in this post - i simply reply like here, end of the story, next.
Ok, and that would leave people who are at average skill level never improving because they only play with Average-skill-level players. See the problem here?
Veterans are a result of our experience in ground, naval, or air. We can help teach less experienced players how to perform and join our ranks. Sometimes it’s down to just observing, sometimes talking to us, sometimes finding a way to get coached by one. There are several different ways Discord and or another similar app is involved in that case.
No. Cause goodbye to your Dicker Max, your Sturer Emil and so many other vehicles from all trees. You would have a lot of fun driving a T-26 cause that is all you’d have for a duration of time.
You could say WW2 history across the board is little more than interesting storytelling.Every thing a drill sergeant says at basic training ,everything a war veteran or Holocaust survivor describes.
How does War Thunder exist when it moves into the area covered by classified data? You tell us all the answer to that one if you are so damn clever.
There is at this point t probably hundreds of threads on this over the last 12 years or so and every time it’s shown why this is a dumb u balanced idea for a game like this one. Just watch YouTube videos of players doing this. It’s a rediculous idea with no though of what they are actually asking for.
They want a historically accurate Vehicle combat simulator. One that Gaijin has time after time, after time stated was never the intention, nor back then, not now.
War Thunder is a old tired game and now modern players are asking for and expecting something War Thunder cant deliver.That is hardly the customers fault is it?
A old tired engine that can’t be tweaked defended by a pseudo–intellectual army of buffoons who can’t see the game for what it really is and pounces on anybody who questions it.
That is what we have here.Blame the OP for the game’s shortcomings…nice .
Maybe they need to make it like EC was before. So, you can take (older in that case) plane to grind for better plane. Maybe with changes like less price and no timer - but overall near
The only way a historical matchmaker may exist is with a totally new gamemode with every platform being as up to date as possible, being capable to face vehicles of the same era. And giving currency and RP compensations to underdogs in the event of a completely unbalanced bracket as a possible outcome.
While i think in ground battles there could be workarounds for many nations, in air, things will get ugly real fast.
The only way for historical matchmaking to be added is to be predominantly ONLY EVENTS.
How many times do we need to state this?
This
Cannot win against this
