no it isnt lmao
You said they barely wrote 2-3 pages a year before JSF snowballed, that would be the early development stage of the program when it’s extremely classified
ah yes hid behind a 10 meter tall tree what game are you playing lol
saclos SAM pf´s only work above 25m´s so he aint wrong
Brother, what are you on about even.
the AA shots at you when doing carrier strikes too anyone who says otherwise hasent played it
The level of classification for the program didn’t change from year to another. It’s not how program secercy works in american major acquistions.
No ok I know about the incident, it’s just that it has very little to do with what we’re dicussing.
no the land based AA find you even when on a carrier
you said mother USA hides f35 problems they showed that one a lot
S-300,SAMP´T maybe but not the 2s6 or ITO´s
and those long-range spaa can barely hit you if you are over the sea (+ the sea is peak MP environment)
Last I checked trees weren’t terrain
Hills and mountains were though
Here, this may help Terrain - Wikipedia
I never said they hide the JSF’s problems.
1 Like
that isnt the case, how controlled information on a program is naturally changes since you cant keep the program classified at a very high level if it needs to be fielded and exported in large numbers.
Because nothing that I’ve seen regarding the F-35’s radar would make it any better or unique compared to the ingame radars in any way or aspect.
how tf do you hide behind a hill??? you multipath because the terrain is too short
maybe this will help:Brain - Wikipedia
One could argue that since Europe had ESA fighter radars in production before the US then there’s a technological gap between Europe and US in terms of ESA fighter technology.
Bro does not know the chaffless notching tech
2 Likes