I’m not blaming USSR because it doesn’t even exist anymore but you for creating this topic, if you don’t want criticism then don’t create a post.
Where did I say you could not criticize this post? All I meant I dont really care about your criticism/will fall to deaf ears.
So you could suggest the better one? Like the 1000Hp modification in a full suggestion post.
I mean the whole point of this post is to enlighten people regarding the variants, not interested in making anymore suggestions compared to the litany I already have made.
Except by the M1000A1 and laser rangefinder, what is the practical difference between it from T-55A? While in practical there’s a difference between T-55M and AM because the add-on armor, technically there’s a huge difference, obviously.
Thats why I am displaying these variants, so it will enlighten gaijin to the multitude of variants instead of adding lazy copypaste vehicles which they probably will just do anyway.
I have bunch of suggestion in the old forum but just got tired of making em. Many of them are now in game, but too many have been accepted than few months after just no reason removed from forums by gaijin.
Like my suggestion on multiple Finnish ships and also the German Focke-Wulf Flitzer suggestion, which gained quite of bit of popularity and than just removed by gaijin no reason given, spent quite a bit of time researching it. Got really burnt out, especially with the new forum throwing suggestion out of whack.
If you want help making a suggestion page to replace the T-72M1 with it, I’ll gladly help 😃
Just recently made a post about replacing it and adding the T-72A under the Swedish part of the tree, as they used it. Quite literally perfect timing, because I couldn’t find anything on the Fin modified T-72M1K1, I knew most of this, but also heard it got thermals, better LRF, and a better FCS. Oh, as well as armor.
Look the message again, I never mentioned that I don’t wanted modified soviet vehicles in another tech tree.
Isn’t obvious the blatant good vehicles that Sweden have in most BRs? Or all Sweden main are blind about this specific topic, because seems true since a guy I know said he prefer VIDAR at 7.7.
Except the T-72 FINMOD, on T-55M what’s the practical difference between it and T-55A? Except by M1000A1 and laser rangefinder.
Yes? You may not make your point obvious, but from previous posts, it’s pretty clear what tech tree your allegiance is to…
You never played against old Sweden, did you?
That’s enough for it to not only be a domestic modification, but also be a different vehicle than the T-55A because of its changes to be able to use that (I.e. FCS, optics, and breech firing mechanism)
Since when Swedish vehicles got nerfed? Oh like Strv 103C moved from 7.7 to 8.7? Big changes.
You never played against old Sweden, did you?
Depends how old, before Air Superiority? Just before this Update, Sweden was kinda uncommon in top tier battles.
That’s enough for it to not only be a domestic modification, but also be a different vehicle than the T-55A because of its changes to be able to use that (I.e. FCS, optics, and breech firing mechanism)
And again I ask for reading that again, what’s the practical difference, not technical.
of or concerned with the actual doing or use of something rather than with theory of ideas.
This can be applied to what I said, what’s the practical difference between T-55A and T-55M? Except by M1000A1 and laser rangefinder.
There’s no add-on armor which is found in T-55AM-1 or active protection system which is found in T-55AMD-1
In technical terms obviously there’s difference as I recognized earlier, but in game, what’s the difference from the T-55A’s FCS and T-55M’s FCS? In-game the breech model and cannon is the same, the optic values is the same except the optic model.
It’s practically a T-55A except by M1000A1 and laser rangefinder, reloading rate is the same, vertical and horizontal drive is slightly slower on T-55A on Stock values.
