you mean the crying whiners from others nations , because they think we are going to be silent? L o L
said the guy who whined the hardest
Who is “they” and why is “they” here thinking you skillful players gonna act normal for 5 second without crying about how bad the US is
3 Likes
cause japanese players are actually cracked. Some of the questionable BR placement in japan tech tree or other minor nation tech tree is because they are actually good and their WR is way too high , leading to gaijin doing no one asked for br placement. And i am sure they don’t need you to cry about it for them
2 Likes
Yeah it’s scary how accruate they are.
Funny how dude say this but coming on here crying about how bad US is and how good USSR is. Bro stats is absolutely peak horrible. What bro doing with “let them cope” when bro the one coping hardest. Still don’t know why other nation player gotta cope but sure , those 18904789123748912748 posts about how bad le US is must be talking about how other nation are le bad then
3 Likes
I’m sorry, pal. No offence, but all I see is nothing but a fake tank that should be removed from the game.
It was created by the infamous Daigensui, AKA Sumeragi or Mai-whatsoever.
How does the Israeli have worse radar? It has better missiles thought, the R-darters/derby are way better at short range HOBS. Slight inferior engine but lighter too. At the end of the day they are sidegrades depending on your playstyle.
The F-15J(M) is better than the F-15C, mainly due to lower weight and stronger engines, but AAM3 are a nice thing too. I don’t know how the AAM4 performs, but I suspect it should be better in HOBS so its a nice option to have.
It is lighter, but still worse FM model, the only thing it does better than the F-16 block50 is peak turn rate, but will still loose in sustained and ofcourse speed and acceleration.
Wasn’t there a wooden mockup of the thing ? Yeah i know it is mostly fake but wooden mockup kinda meet their requirement considering the ostwind 2 also pretty fake , it also only got a wooden mockup IIRC. Correct if I am wrong but still I think it is fine for it to be in the game
This whole forum post is nothing but cope
1 Like
Well, seems You and I have slightly different POVs about Ho-ri.
I think Gaijin should’ve removed the ‘Production’(LOFL) version of Ho-ri…
they never ever mass-produced Ho-ri and IJA would never be able to reach that level
even if the US didn’t nuke Hiroshima and did a full assault as ‘Operation Downfall’
It is just a bollock.
Its not like a radar signature takes up an inordinate amount of space such that they can’t keep it there. Besides, Iran still operates F-4Es and last I checked they had a US carrier parked right outside.
Sounds like a justification to put F-4 radars on their threat library.
Weren’t engines the same? And weight difference is minuscule. As for the missiles, the AAM-3 is barely better and the AAM-4 is more maneuverable with less range.
Neither are real, though at least the Production is a very good tank (in downtiers because its really a 6.7, MAYBE 7.0 that was put at 7.3) thanks to armor+speed+gun all being quite good. Prototype doesn’t belong at 6.7 by any stretch of the imagination.
There were a couple Ho-Ris partially built at the end of the war of a different design, that should be added instead.
1 Like
One of the posts I missed when looking for typos.
That’s F-4D, not E.
F-4E is in the threat library in-game. As is Mig-21, Mig-23, and one other standard pulse radar.
All PD radars are in the threat library for ALR-56.
ALR-46 is an unknown to me since I’ve only researched 56 personally, and I didn’t do as much as other members.
ho ri was taken from designs from the ferdinand tho.
Correct, however it is indisputable that the F-15J(M) is a direct upgrade to the F-15C in regards to A2A. The difference is negligible, but not zero.
That is easily the worst I’ve seen in a clip of this happening
2 Likes
Nah. It didn’t go for my allies. At least it just went nowhere.
2 Likes
The F-15J(M) is 400kg lighter, has the AAM-4, and the AAM-3. Overall its a better plane even if its small.
I have never seen 4 in a row from two different opposing aircraft
Did you actually look at the graphs that you posted? Or did you just see a bigger number at a glance and think it’s amazing? You’re not gonna notice 440 kg of weight loss in rb and the AAM 3 is not even 100 kph faster while you don’t see a significant change to the range over the 9M until 6 kilometers lmao. The only time you’re seeing a shot at 6 kilometers is if you’re coming down on top of someone from orbit.
You should pull up the graph showing the pull of the AAM 3 vs 9M too and show just how much more it pulls too. (I’ll give you a hint. The results are similar to the range/drag test in that it’s pretty minimal.)
Also what you didn’t point out with the AAM 4 vs 120 is that the 120 has more range, so it’s a sidegrade at best. This is what I hate about these arguments, you’re arguing over small performance differences that won’t be noticed 98% of the time. It’s like making a 100 ft tower and complaining about the one next to you being half a foot taller.
The irony is that you’re complaining about missiles that are artificially nerfed already in favor of keeping your aircraft from getting artificially nerfed.
Also my opinion on the whole 229 deal is that it should’ve been A: both planes get 220s until other nations can have something that can keep up to it. B: The F-15E is forced to carry its CFTs (not very likely since they’re running missions without them now irl). Or my personal favorite, option C: Both F-15Es get 229s and put up to 14.0. It is such a big upgrade that it shouldn’t sit with the rest of the 13.7s
3 Likes
And add an Su-30 or whatever would be an equivalent to F-15E. I’ve heard Su-34 isn’t like F-15E and isn’t just better than Su-27SM.