In my opinion, I want gaijin considered 2 AIM-9 sidewinder (AIM-9P-4 & AIM-9M) exchange AIM-9P & AIM-9L. add active radar homing MRAAM AIM-120B AMRAAM placeholder or AIM-120C-5 AMRAAM
Gaijin not forget add LANTIRN AN/AAQ-14 targeting pod & AGM-65G Maverick (placeholder) and GBU-10 & GBU-12 Paveway II laser-guided bomb from F-14B Tomcat on F-16A Block 20 MLU before Major Update “Seek & Destroy” update to live server
Gajin not ready add AIM-9M, LANTIRN AN/AAQ-14 targeting pod (placeholder) and GBU-10 & GBU-12 Paveway II laser guided bomb on F-16A Block 20 from china tech tree in december 2022. but not this quarter
Or other choice gaijin could add F-16A Block 20 MLU (2007) after F-16A Block 20 MLU
Seems to imply it is exempt from FOIA but that may be outdated. If the document predates the 30 year rule and has no export restriction statement then it is usable for reports.
I.e. if it is older than 30 years old and has no export control warning it is safe.
interesting statement given the Mig-23 nerfs that were long over due finally coming this patch.
But sure, Russian vehicles so often come under-performing, just like the Ka-50/52, IS-6, Obj 279, Mig-21Bis, Su-11, KV-220, T-80BVM, 2S38, Mig-23MLD etc
Meanwhile the F-15s are missing BOL, and the F-16s are missing a slew of armament options as well as their PIDS pods for extra CMs, but I suppose nice things arent allowed to be added to the USA as well. Given it took Gaijin a YEAR to add the AV-8B+ to the US TT.
MiG-23 required a great many adjustments to meet performance expectations. The charts were misread, and this is only one example. Nearly every American fighter with the exception of the F-15 initially came in overperforming and had to be adjusted down. The F-15 had some unique issues that were amended.
You being you, conveniently blowing past all the other Russian vehicles that come to the game over-performing, while the F-15s “over performance” was by a 5% over tuned FM.
This “bias narrative” is tiring, it harms the discussion on vehicles that got designed wrongly ingame and the possibility of getting them fixed/improved, pure Reddit cringery.
Well for the start:
-MAW systems
-Proper radars on their aircraft
-AIM-9M for the F-16A
-AIM-9M for the F-14B
They just got the AV-8B, one year later
And a lot of ordonance that is not in game but we won’t discuss those
The F-15 was actually underperforming in certain areas and over in others. The FM was drastically improved after my reports regardless. Yet you’re shoving the idea that I’m biased. Truly remarkable logic.
Russia winrate in ground rb (where ppl most complain about russian bias) dropped significantly after the vikhrs nerf which were the main reason for their absolute domination in top tier, t80s and t90s always were inferior or at the very least equal to the leopards and abrams. Air rb wise to this day the fulcrum and the flanker respective fms suck ass while they still didn’t model flcs for the f16 which causes it to dance in the air, not to mention that now with the amraams and the multipathing nerf their bvr dominance will also be stopped.
If you cherrypick enough you can make Gaijin appear to be any country biased, in the end it doesn’t make sense because it’s a private company that needs to profit and such behavior would harm their income.