i think with some mod at minimum it’s could be done much like various guns portee on MT-LB
or at least something like Type 94 Truck (Type 41) in suggestion post
2 Likes
well if you can give good enough of a argument it could be added.
There are many vehicles that firing the gun will break the vehicle in time but sometimes it does not matter and wont matter in game.
I wouldnt compare a 75mm WW1 era dinky mountain gun to a 105mm modern howitzer
The key problem is it cannot be fully deployed. The LG-1 needs to have the braces between the wheel extended as well (you can see it in the photo on the right)
its not like we even know it can be modded or even fired on the chassis, so what we’re doing is entirely guesswork. unless we have some form of the gun being shown deployed or being mentioned to be able to fire on the chassis, it unfortunately will remain as fictional
True but those are dedicated vehicles though. The only vehicle i can think of where its just “slap x onto y” ingame is the BTR-ZD, and even then it still has mounts & braces
2 Likes
Bosvark and Yastervark both are ground mounts affixed to a truck, but they’re positively attached and it’s intended to be fired from the truck
2 Likes
i was more so focusing on the “makeshift” element of it, the fact that it has just wires and logs holding it down in place
3 Likes
Should have used zip ties more effective
I think the LG-1 gun has a future in game with infantry it looks like it can be pushed around and be easily set up plus the emergency ability for line of site fire. Could use it a a push gun of sorts if Gaijin wants that kind of thing.
Would be funny to have fortified a building in infantry mode and someone setting this up outside as a siege gun.
After years compiling Indonesian sub TT vehicle, i’m surprised no one try to make how Indonesian sub TT look like in JP TT, both Ground and Aircraft.
Haven’t touched ground yet, but air. Also note that ** xyz ** are hypothetical and * xyz * ordered but not delivered.
7 Likes
Indonesia is going to have a lot of modified for Indonesia, trialed, Asian Financial Crisis, Cancelled. Still its enough for a post.
Harimau MT got passed to the devs!
6 Likes
for aircraft there’s this:
2 Likes
On that note, what’s Harimau max reverse speed? Definitely not 5 km/h right? Lol
not stated, but it uses the Allison/Caterpillar X300 full automatic transmission with 4x forwards & 2 reverse, so its mostly going to be close to the CV90 series at ~30-40 kph
oh, it’s good then
Ho-RI gonna be removed soon, so for replacement do you people think PT-76(M) could replace it for 7.3 ?
1 Like
The already implemented Type 75 & Type 99s are its replacement
but in terms of what Indonesia can uniquely offer at around that BR would be:
-
PT-76(M) | as youve mentioned (6.7 - 7.0)
-
SBS MLRS | (6.7 - 7.0)
-
Anoa PK20 | if given APDS belt (7.7)
-
Anoa/Badak FSVs | if it doesnt get APFSDS (7.3)
not including the AMX variants since they would be at around 8.0 (like the DF105)
but in terms of its role (armored SPG capable of taking hits and giving them) there’s not really much alternatives. Because of that Id prefer the Ho-ri be reworked into its more realistic form
1 Like
PT-76(M) most likely sit in 7.3 like Italian C13 T90
Badak most likely get higher BR with APFSDS
its hull is worse than the C13 though. slightly worse armor, worse engine power, worse top-speed, plus it doesnt have that big void area in the rear. Its fair to put it at a lower BR especially considering the AUBL 74 also uses the same cannon and its much lower in BR (6.7)
for the Anoa/badak i think its better to separate it into two separate year with the early model prototypes of anoas not having apfsds and the proper Badak & scorpion having them, because otherwise it would just be 5 vehicles which are going to be the exact same thing
for the Anoa/badak i think its better to separate it into two separate year with the early model prototypes of anoas not having apfsds
this is what i fear the most, Gaijin probably doesn’t bother make 2 separate model for 2 differrent BR