Delayed activation of the Airfield SPAA

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
13

350km/h is pretty low speed - 97.2m/s

60seconds of dealy = 5.8km

and a crew is not gonna take 2 min to react.

at best for attackers(worst from PoV) reaction time of SPAAG should be 40 seconds

  • human reaction is about 2 seconds, and let’s say 35 seconds to aim the gun around from 180° + elevation
  • then gives maybe a 15%-20% hit rate for like 10 seconds (adjustements issues)
14

So what do you want for a time?

15

told you already,… read

40 seconds delay + 10 seconds of bad hit rate

that gives you a range of 50(s)x97.2(m/s) = 4.86 km at 350km/h

with higher rank and higher speed - consider technology of new guns to reduce time delay but have similar range of delay.

means that:
Rank 1 average low speed : 350km/h (97.2 m/s) - 50 seconds
Rank 2 : 360km/h (100m/s) 48.6 seconds
Rank 3 : 380 km/h (105.5m/s) 46.1 seconds
Rank 4 : 390 km/h (108.3m/s) 44.9 seconds
Rank 5: 450 km/h (jets) (125m/s) 38.9 seconds
Rank 6 : 550 km/h (152.8 m/s) 31.8 seconds
Rank 7: 650 km/h (180.5 m/s) 26.9 seconds
Rank 8: 700km/h (194.5m/s) 25 seconds

means you can travel 4.86km before Airfield AA got high precision rate

16

No, stop enabling airfield camping in one direction.
Airfield campers in both directions are people that can’t fight; both are stat padders.

1 Like
17

This is why I want to find the perfect thing.

18

This helps against camping on both sides. IMO

19

just edited previous message

1 Like
20

The perfect thing IMO is a x minute timer [I’m leaning on 5 minutes] exists against the team that generates no score.
This prevents long-matches from airfield campers in one direction, and prevents long matches from space bombers.

With stronger airfield SPAA to prevent the other type of airfield camper so people can rearm and repair to have a chance of fighting enemies again without major disadvantage.

21

btw, add a rules for people with no more weaponnary (no missiles + less than 5% guns ammo) so the timer got reduced by 33% - seems fair as pilot can radio call his base

22

Sounds not bad but we also need something tats doesn’t take ages for gajin to develop XD

23

Nah. As I said its a skill issue when you can’t manage your fuel and ammo

24

Well both will cause the new SPAA requires new AI to run the SPAA… current SPAA needs new AI to run it. -_-

25

Yeah

26

say that to the WT community,… most are aiming shit,…

i don’t aim that shitty but when i end up in 1vs8 situation, at some point i need some reloads.

if you can’t handle that then you’re already smithing out a Farming tool,… just you wait everyone coming back at airfield to kill,… this would also mean that you’re proposal have and makes no sense

as i’m already able to kill people on airfields

27

Guess why most have shitty aim, because the never flew a fighter like a fighter. Most ppl don’t really play the game. They want to get to top tier but forget to learn how to play it correct and this is a skill issue. They have a brain to think with so they should do it.

28

I can do this with a wyvern. Fly trough the airfield with 700km/h and done

29

So, you already can destroy people on airfields by your say. (and i do that with far less faster aircrafts too)

there i don’t see your problem anymore,…
also gaijin gives other options to win games, such as pouding ground targets.

30

It was a joke…

31

Actually i am wondering why you felt the need to open a thread - there is a pinned thread dealing with af aaa:

Airfield AAA Discussion Thread - Air Realistic Battles

So whilst i see this thread as redundant and therefore useless a short extract from the pinned thread:

So you might realize that your topic (and the attached poll) is actually useless. I mean gaijin is not stupid - they are fully aware of this topic. Their last action happened in October 2023 when aaa’s vanished from forward airfields.

So trying to add credibility to your request by adding a poll is useless as long as you can’t add a high confidence level to those numbers. If you want to change something you have to create a suggestion.

32

Because I read every post in the forum. Just didn’t saw it and another post doesn’t hurt anyone. StoneWT didn’t closed it but changed it from air RB to RB battles.