Dance of Dragon - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Game Discussion General Discussion
8649

as someone who’s on the receiving end : i can confirm (torping them is extra satisfying though)

As for the nuke, not sure it would exist for the br Scharnhorst is at, and it would have to be balanced for naval. It’s also important to remember than Scharn and Kron have been left without their equivalents in other countries, so that helps

The nuke thing was just a random idea anyway, we are way too far in time for these things yet

if i were to make a guess, Gaijin will probably go with a development of the following 3 things in parallel :

  • inter war and WW2 submarines
  • continue to fill WW2 battleships, cruisers and destroyers
  • slowly start with early cold war missile DDs

once those things start to seriously be filled then we may talk about more modern stuff

2 Likes
8650

Question:
Why do people hate this new update so much
We literally got everything we needed
J-10, Su-24, A-10C, JF-17
And like people are making fun of the fact that china is getting a lot of stuff when literally two months ago the same people said china is copy and paste

8651

Where have you seen hate for this update?

I mean there’s been people arguing about additions and features but I haven’t seen any hate towards the update

8652

i mean China is copy paste up to a point where they started manufacturing their own stuff, happy to see they are getting some good stuff

8653

I mean, if you are a Top Tier Chinese player of C*S player, maybe, hahah

But so far, there’s nothing for Top Tier ground players. Only a 70€ Premium and 2 high tier IFVs that take 4 months to grind each because they are Squadron vehicles.

I don’t hate the update, there just aren’t many vehicles for me. I would have looked forward to MBT fixes and corrections as much as new vehicles, but there are none of that either beyond ZTZ-99A, which I won’t be able to get in a long while hahah.

So far, what I am looking forward the most, is polishes, UI and QoL updates, etc.

8654

A-10C not mounted AGM-65H, would be AGM-65K

Sadly, I never saw AGM-65K model on cdk dev server

Battle rating 11.7 for ground RB minimum

I not saw A-10C armed AGM-65D in real life, don’t know AGM-65K colour model

8655

As an air only player this update is great. I can totally see ground or naval players being meh about it though.

8656

what’s new with the new dev update?

8657

Yeah… as a Naval player, I would normally have been hyped about USS Tennessee; however, seeing it’s just another American BB that blows up to 76mm HE due to the horrendous Naval damage models’ state, there is not too much hype for her anymore xD

1 Like
8658

Theres a reason I used to be a naval player. :(

3 Likes
8659

A few minor changes, and Eastern Europe was not only changed, but also improved. It’s no longer just a line now.

8661

1.1 Gigs and absolutely nothing new on the devserver. Not even new camos or maps.

8662

Not with only 3x or 4x AGM-65s at most.

8663

image

War Thunder Screenshot 2024.09.03 - 12.02.46.64
War Thunder Screenshot 2024.09.03 - 12.02.46.641920×1080 205 KB

Well there is one new thing

5 Likes
8664

Harrier GR.7 gets 4 at most, add 4 9Ms and that’s all your pylons accounted for (aside from a dumb bomb on the fuselage)

8665

honestly speaking this update is one of the healthiest updates in a while

8666

what a surprise

8667

And the Harrier is 500 km/h faster and has triple the climb rate.

The only real loadout option for the A-10C is 3x AGM-65D, very maybe 1x AGM-65G if it can be placed next to the tpod and the rest will be APKWS. Every other armament option is just dead weight.

8668

But i just need that P2V-7B Neptune!

2 Likes
8669

you didn’t mention any other characteristics so neither did I

1 Like