No.
ahaha , guess i’m not suprised , well i guess you will have had finished a long time ago , unlicke mine where i’m still missing 1 , and 4 are 50/50
1 Like
2 Likes
I guess I can add LATAM to the list now lol
Netherlands
Poland
Denmark
Spain
Austro-Hungarian
Swiss As it’s more or less confirmed now
Canada
LATAM
3 Likes
what is LATAM?
lol I don’t know what list you’re talking about, tell me. I just came to check the news and found this funny comment in 8-bit… Poland is a sub-tree of Germany… Visegrad of Russia… and LatAm of Italy lol (did he even know that Hungary is in Italy?).
1 Like
smack in portugal with it , Iberian Union , and give it to italy , would finaly fix some AA gaps towars high tier
Spoiler
BMR SIDAM 25 (Spain)
MIM-72 Chaparral (Portugal)
AMX-30 Roland II (Spain) (also available on M-113 , but no pics found , and amx-30 version will be all around better)
also gives them a good amount of pretty good leopards
5 Likes
Oh this is my list Germans want x nation as subs because the Germans say we wanting the world because of Australia and Canada lol
2 Likes
No it’s not since it’s only kills are party ballons
it’s all Bismarck’s fault… If only Wilhelm II had been born a generation earlier… Jokes aside, 150 years later, the legacy endures lol
It’s very curious that the Aussie Abrams is in the US tech tree and the Aussie Aardvark is in the British tech tree… It seems that the only rule is that there are no rules; everything is very arbitrary.
3 Likes
Spain/ Portugal would have been objectively a better sub tree than Hungary in every way possible. They only did Hungary because they’re based in Hungary.
2 Likes
More like easier copy&paste. Spain would require some actual work.
3 Likes
Iirc it wasn’t built (mock up only)
Honestly I would like to see more variants of Italian Leopards and OF-40 instead of Spanish AMX-30s and their derivatives.
PS in terms AA Italy can still get some nice ones + Romania can help as well:
OF-40 PRTL, CA-95, Gepard (CA-94M), SA-8B and etc.
1 Like
I could be wrong but aren’t these AGM-65Hs?
The resistance of the J-10 is now completely abnormal. Its low-altitude acceleration is not as good as that of the F4, and its high-altitude speed of 1.5 Mach at 5,000 meters is nearly 1 minute slower than that of the F16/15c. This is obviously not in line with reality.
2 Likes
To be honest I can understand both sites with this anti radiation missile thing. I want them because they are cool and for custom battles. But I can understand that they are hard to balance. It is important that CAS is fun to play but also that it gets stopped by anti air. But yeah im not the best ground rb player I mostly play naval and air nowadays.
AL31FN is issued in devblog but what about the canard, is it moveable yet in dev server?
Regarding acceleration someone has mentioned this although it is hard to make an issue cause the airframe is still ‘work in progress’ whilst evidence for faster acceleration is hard to implement.
Bro part 4 required?
J-10A has too many erroneous flight resistances.This is a joke that the flight acceleration capability of J10A is even worse than that of F4.
5 Likes