your answer is by far one of the best in this comment section.
J-7d IS NOT a striker but It seats at 10.7. plus A-10 kills everyone at 9.3
facts
I understand this harrier would be too OP at 10.7. But AV-8B and harrier T.10 must be 11.0. It’s not fair for them fighting 12.3 aircrafts. I have over 1000 hours in this game I know what’s a good plane and a sh… plane.
I just posted this post because gaijin said so.
Other than that why the hell A-10s is 10.3? very few planes at 9.3 can defeat them
1 Like
It can’t be 10.7 but it can be 11.0 just like harrier T.10.
Bucc S.2 is pure pain just like the harrier with fox 3s
disagree, It’s a hornet
Gaijin Does not like the GB that’s why it’s 10.7…
Strange, why does this become pathetic when I literally throw what you vomited back to you?
Yeah, this is pathetic; your premise has become self-refuting, but you are the one who can’t believe.
I literally explained why [simply moving down] can’t be a solution.
If AV-8B(NA) with 4 AIM-9L goes down to 10.7, then A-10A which has same four AIM-9L but infinitely flies worse than AV-8B(NA) should move down in the same way as AV-8B(NA) does
And if A-10A goes down from 10.7 to 10.0 just like how AV-8B did
There is no way that flareless jets in 9.0-10.0BR survive.
Was it so difficult to understand?
Or was your vomit too bitter to swallow?
Tasting your own medicine is hurt, aren’t ya?
That is your conclusion which can be concluded by Reductio ad absurdum.
You literally argued that BR balancing should not exist, and made your whole argument self-refuting.
It can’t be a solution because it will create a cascade/domino type of compression.
Because it is still way better than 11.0BR jets such as SHAR FRS.1
(same 4x AIM-9L but flies inferior because SHAR is based on Harrier 1 fuselage)
But if we reaaaaly need a makeshift solution as a stopgap
Maybe we could try sending AV-8B(NA) and Harrier T.10 down to 11.0 ‘temporary’
(I DISAGREE ABOUT THIS IDEA.)
Yes, totally true. That needs to be solved by decompression
Send 12.3BR jets higher and onwards, making the gap wider.
Because, in your theory
It is not fair for A-10 fighting 11.7BR aircrafts.
Lol no you didn’t. Saying that other vehicles at 10.7 suck thus this vehicle should stay at 11.3 is not a valid explanation.
Not sure why you’re so insistent on this.
Lame strawmanning and mischaracterising
It is not my problem that you can’t understand a valid explanation.
It will CREATE compression clusterfuck eventually.
It is your problem that you can’t understand a valid explanation.
Next time, Chew before swallowing.
Because it is literally a summary of your theory, which is summarised by Reductio ad Absurdum.
It is not my fault, it is your fault who bringing it as logic.
I am not sure why you are so insistent about defending your blunders.
If you want to keep nitpicking my quote, while being unhelpful about the discussion for AV-8B(NA)
Knock it off.
Your explanation was far from valid, and no moving it down will not create compression issues.
Maybe you should stop tryna say that we shouldn’t have BR balancing for the AV-8B NA
He didn’t said this at all, and nobody did so. That’s what you are not able to understand!
We want BR Balancing for all planes. YOU want a better slot for a single plane which will bring more suffering to lower BRs.