Cas spam in Ground RB ruins entire match

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
143

Is that your answer? Is that your amazing Argumentation at work? :)

You and your pals seem to think it funny to attack anybody who even complains about CAS like it’s all in their head or something.
I don’t even play top tier but I can see the frustration form those who do and sympathize as we have the same down here in WW2 sometimes.

CAS is a bigger issue to the newbie and its newbies who leave the game in horror. With TO mode they can at least get a foot in the door before they move to full fat GRB. They can at least concentrate on the ground without looking at the sky every two minutes but you come along and make out anybody suggesting such a thing is the antichrist or something.

2 Likes
144

I provided a literal dozen of examples for that. ;)

You on the other hand answered none of my questions. All you did so far was sling around personal attacks. ;)

1 Like
145

tank-purists, just because they complain about CAS or there is more than 1 thread and you lable them as tank-purists

146

Exactly even though none of us are. I mean so what if we are . What tank game hates on tank lovers?

2 Likes
147

Have you not read my previous post, in which I answered this accusation already? It is not intended by me to use this term as an attack.

1 Like
148

He also tried to discredit my statment that gaijin have lots of money, while its obvious they do

149

But you use it anyway and constantly stick up for CAS hate

150

When was War Thunder ever advertised as anything else than an aircraft or combined arms game?

@Wishie7119 discredit: I asked for proof. Since when is asking for sources “discrediting”?

1 Like
151

The problem is no adjustment is going to satisfy both sides, thus more nerfs/buffs are going just to make more people angry and divide community.

Adding TO would allow a proper unnerf of all air weaponary and changing the current ground RB into proper combined mode.

Untill then, we will just sit in the same place for another 10 years.

1 Like
152

You not noticed Naval? That means ships in case you were not aware.

1 Like
153

Your asking for information that is privately owned and you know this, but in that wiki it dios state his net worth at 1 point of his career

154

Sure, I think, we came to an agreement in another topic on CAS (what a coincidence, huh? A topic, which this is a duplicate of) about providing single-military-branch modes and an additional EC-type combined mode with all vehicle classes.

1 Like
155

Drone age, but that is now nerfed usless. Your like to argue every statment made, like as if you are a gaijin employee

156

I think you see yourself as some kind of forum caped crusader working on Gaijins behalf(maybe you are) but you do nothing to address peoples frustration you just stand arrogantly dismissing the complaints and citing the old mantra of what War Thunder is and always was. Like Nero fiddling while Rome burned or the arrogant Romans pretending nothing was wrong as Rome collapsed.

Look about the forum. Lots of players united in a game ruined by CAS in some form or another. No point just attacking individuals.

1 Like
157

Drone Age was advertised by a trailer that showed two Su-25s ground pounding. It also shows an Mi-24 flying over tanks.

158

Sadly there are still people here who will actively oppose TO because they don’t like me or the whole ‘tank’ aspect of the game.

1 Like
159

And the rest

160

That was stated as a reason in another post (Not you by name but it was you lol) .Its pathetic and its distracting from the issue.

161

Helicopter battles was a flop, but they not tried TO battles in the true sence

162

As I said on multiple occasions, I am not opposed to the idea of TO, I even think that it would make the game more attractive to a lot of players, but I am appaled by the behaviour of many (not all of them), who are asking for it.

1 Like