is doing a lot of lifting here. I already said why I think it’s not the case and the opposite actually.
Also, from your statement “rather pretend you are right” I guess that you don’t believe than Ground Only would take 90% of players from GRB.
But as you said, let’s go with it for the sake of the argument:
Why should Gaijin piss of a million in profit?
To make the player experience better.
It’s quite obvious I think
Why should dairy company spend money to make sure the milk is not toxic? To make the customer happy.
When we “rioted” against gaijin and they changed a bunch of thing about the economy, don’t you think they believed they would loose some money from player playing for silver lions with real money?
Why did they “cave in”. Because the player asked what’s best for them.
A game company has to make money I’m not stupid I know that. But the most important thing is to give players a fun experience.
And so, as a player, I rightfull ask for gaijin to try to implement a gamemode that would be better for everyone (My opinion of course).
Get back with me when you can spawn a SPAA in Air RB.
Unless you mean the AI vehicles, in which case you are really grasping at straw, since you know damn well that they are, for all intent and purpose, useless. It’s decoration.
Fun picture man, what a way to ignore an argument.
I guess you were really pissed when the tobacco company were forced to include the risk of consuming tobacco on their boxes.
Apart from the real world I literally included a recent example of Gaijin themselves making change that would make less money (it’s what they believe) to please the player but whatever.
I’ll give you 1 thing, you are a lot smarter than Pangolin, tho it’s not a high bar.
You can try to give a estimation, and give me reasons why you think so, like I did.
If you won’t there is no need to waste your time with me.
Because compared to the economy it’s not a issue that affect everyone. It’s why we discuss it on the forum.
It’s like saying: “If the BI was so OP at 6.7, why is no one review bombing gaijin, the BI must be balanced then”.
Not to mention that I think review bombing happened because of the backless of all player being fed up from multiple change negative change on the economy, with gaijin completely ignoring the issue.
For the record, I don’t really think review bombing is the best way to go about it, hence why I engage with the forum.
And on the forum, almost forms about ground only had a positive reaction. So you cannot act like the engagement is a minority.
Grasping at straws? I literally said every mode has multiple vehicle times. The only reason you can spawn tanks in ARB is cause it would be boring.
Your “argument” did not deserve to be entertained with a proper response.
The forum often holds the minority opinion cause most players on the forum are here only to complain abt smthn that no1 else has issues with, e.g complaining that T34/30/29 is OP.
I’m not even a CAS hater, As as said earlier in this thread I do play CAS.
Genuinely I believe than a tank only mode would probably gather 50% of the current GRB playerbase. Because their is no denying that playing CAS is fun, no matter how unbalanced. So a decent portion of player would stay getting bombed for the hope of being the one bombed.
Meanwhile the ones who only want tank vs tank would go on the tank only gamemode. Their is more than enough player for it.
They’ll never do it because would make a precedent for enough engagement = official response from gaijin.
Meh, I guess it depends
The Poll should be something like:
If a supplementary gamemode like Ground Realistic Battle was added but the ability to spawn plane was removed, would you consider playing it regularly?
> Yes, Both
> Ground RB only
> Ground ONLY only
> Never
> Do not play ground / Do not want to awnser
Because what we want to know is how many player would play often on said ground only.
If less than 20% choose the play on ground only, the idea can be scrapped.
If less than 20% choose to play on ground rb, it tells gaijin that CAS is unbalanced and player would like to see it being rebalanced.
If the poll is correctly made and is not ambiguous, I think you and I will be able to rightfully ask the other side to stop complaining.
Honestly It could still be added even with 1% positive answer. Naval still exist despite having less than 1% of the players. I don’t know why an exception should be made for naval and not for ground.
