Can you guys stop hijacking this thread for discussion about individual aircraft’s shortcomings and advantages and comparisons of certain bodyparts of each other?!?
This thread is an important tool to collect issues about the implementation of aircraft systems like MFD’s, HUD’s, and cockpit systems in general, even consulted by devs regularly as it represents a very comprehensive collection of still open issues.
To bang your chest, find another thread to do so. Please.
Fixed
May I ask about the idea behind the marks (Open/Accepted/marked as xx)?
It might just be a result of the reports showing their age, but why mark something as “Open” when the report is “Accepted”? What matters (to me, at least) is whether the report is “Accepted,” “Not a Bug,” “Duplicate,” etc.
If the report has no label, that’s one thing, but why keep it when it already has a label?
It’s just that some of the labels are outdated when I get free time I’m going to go through and update them.
Working on this topic + working on other new suggestions / adding more to existing suggestions requires a fair bit of free time.
I am hoping to have some free time tonight to be able to go through and check the tags once I’m done with everything IRL and a suggestion I’m working on.
Fair enough, maybe it would be a Idea to write at the end something similar to last updated (game version)(date)?
:D
I feel that, these lists can take realy quite some time :3
That’s a good idea actually, might just do that following the next major update release.
Gone through and updated the tags on the not fixed issues.
After the next major update I will start adding a timestamp of when I have last checked the issues tags / are still present. I am planning on making time to do this monthly however that may change depending on anything happening IRL or with the last 2 updates of the year due to the time between them being very short (easier to just check after them in the new year).
As always if anyone spots an issue that has been updated or fixed in the meantime that I haven’t seen then feel free to let me know.
It pains me to see the Israel section only has a singular bug report fixed.
Hopefully this next update we’ll see the due fixes for symbology, MFD’s and other sensors reported by my peers and I.
So with the Sky Odyssey Major Update coming and the dev server soon to be opened again any reports regarding new issues for HUDs, HMDs, MFDs, Cockpits, or VR then please do reply with links to those reports.
I will be collecting them and on the full release of the update I will then add the still existing issues to the list.
i can tell you that there will probably be quite some reports with gaijin adding 2 completly new HMDs
and new MFD pages
(i already spooted some issues during the dev stream)
Current dev server reports.
[DEV] MiG-35S IRST Lacking TV+IR Display for cockpit MFD
[DEV] MiG-35 Cockpit missing HMTDI-KOS sensor + monocle
[DEV] J-7D Missing new Radar FCR Display Page
[DEV] J-16 MFD displays Russian Cyrillic “Р” for radio altitude
[DEV] F-102 Lacks proper cockpit radar symbology
Is there any info if Su-30SM/SM2 would get new HMD too or it’s just MiG-35S?
Only Fulcrums have used the HMTDI-KOS so far
By my information irl Su-27SM3, Su-30SM and Su-35S should have new HMDs since the “circle” is not used since 2016.
So they at least should have similar ones to MiG-35S, that’s why I am asking if it is already planned to add it to the game or not
there is no sources for anything besides the modern Fulrums being able to carry it
How accurate is the MiG-35S HMD compared to IRL?
overall its pretty close
the biggest issue it currently has is that the lines going through it are always pointing up
and that the tip of the pull up arrow is solid
I assume the lines are of an artificial horizon.
from my understanding they are supposed to show your radar/irst search area