I did read it. What part of it do you think is ridiculous?
Also this is going of topic, if you want to continue the discussion we can do so in PM.
Not entirely both explode steel plates into incoming projectiles but funny enough relict actually has worse performance then duplet the manufacturer stated themselves relict can only stop 40% of APFSDS while duplet stops 90% of APFSDS
I also bug reported the type 10s transmission and acceleration inaccuracy with the actual specs and name of transmission but it has been ignored so far
7 Likes
The response from the technical moderator that I attached as a screenshot.
Relikt is an ERA that uses a propelled plate launched toward the incoming projectile. Duplet, on the other hand, is a set of explosive charges that destroy the projectile with cumulative jets. In fact, the only thing they have in common is that something explodes inside.
Moreover, if I remember correctly, these types of ERA came from parallel programs that began back in the USSR, so there can be no talk of any reverse engineering.
If a report you have sent hasn’t been looked at for a long time then you can send a private message to one of the Technical Moderators and ask about it. You can find all the teams and the areas they handle listed here: (Who is who and Reporting Procedure). If you don’t get an answer within a few days you can add more moderators from the list to the original message instead of sending a new message (that way you preserve the date of the message and it doesn’t look like a new request), adding one of the moderators to the message every 2-3 days or so until you get an answer.
Please do not to add the seniors until you have tried all other regular moderators, the Seniors likely won’t answer unless they are added and pinged by the regular moderators but if you’ve added all the regular moderators with no answer then you can add the seniors.
That it just completely wrong
Duplet ERA is also just made up of nizh ERA something it also doesn’t show up in war thunder
And what does Relikt have to do with this?
Because it game duplet ERA should be performing better then relikt ERA after all the manufacturer of relikt has stated it can only stop 40% of a APFSDS while in game bm oplot front plate cannot even stop 3bm46 in some areas while in irl testing it the duplet ERA stopped 90% of ofl 120 f1 APFSDS witj only 20mm of armour penetration
Please try to understand how the ERA systems in question actually work in real life.
I did some calculations on existing threads according to the BM42 on turret tests, the first part of the message is a response to what a community manager is saying about the test.
In the spoiler you can see the calculations.
According to the BM42 tests on the turret, Duplet should provide 400mm+ of kinetic protection.
1 Like
Also to note 3bm42 would also perform better against ERA because its two piece core ammunition design
1 Like
funny i think gaijin needs to learn how to calculate ERA bm oplot has 3x less ERA protection yet being the direct opposite case irl
2 Likes
Then maybe they shouldn’t label the game as the most realistic simulation tank game then and pride themselves in “accurate penetration” gaijin add realistic things whenever it suits them not us
1 Like
That’s just marketing nonsense. They have tons of reports lying around that they’ve been ignoring for years, while at the same time they introduce new wunderwaffe that ignore the laws of physics and common sense.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
No, they’ve always been more or less like that.
Snail has a habit of ignoring bugs in Japanese vehicles
Both CTWVs since release have a bug that even if you don’t have any ammo, your magazine is 100% full and your ammo can still explode
6 Likes
This also wouldn’t be as bad for the ICV if the unmanned turret actually behaved like one rather than just killing the crew
1 Like
The way Gaijin is treating Japanese players and players who play on the Japanese tech tree is utterly disgusting. The F-5 FCU’s ballistic computer has been malfunctioning for almost a year.