An Argentine air sub-tree for Germany

we still waiting for you to adress those

Because CZ + PL would work very well together and Yugoslavia could independently. The others could be sorted wherever most appropriate.

I had quit caring for that conversation and decided to go non-verbal

1 Like

so you do not care about germanys tree problems like the light tank gap i told you about and now are sweeping it under the rug, exactly like i said? great just great

That is what you make of it and is a very rude way of summarizing what I said after the conversation we had.

but isnt it what you are doing?
i asked u what are we supposed to do, when there is no german option
image

and you decided to ignore it, i am geniunly asking what shall we do?
We do not have german options for those br gaps
Neither are we apparently allowed to ask for other nations vehicles. You claim Dutch for benelux, switzerland can be its own tree, argentinia part of a future LATAM one.
But who can we look to for solutions when you guys deny us any possible solutions?

I had already answered to that and your last messages before this continuation had summarized the conversation.
I see no reason why you expected a response or felt so entitled to it as to ask for my attention after it was finished.

With that I have nothing more to say here, have a good one.

so sweeping it under the rug like i said, you said

foreign products would be possible. but you fight as at every turn we even suggest anything.
Basicaly we have no nation or anything to point to, while everyone else apparently is allowed to.
Thanks for nothing i guess. you always act like you got the moraly high ground, but when someone points out serious problem that arent limited to air top tier but even low tier, you dodge the matter and dont want to even name the nation you would find most acceptable as a solution filler.
That is just sad man

1 Like

@Godvana
btw did you try to get this accepted into the real suggestion forum thread?
There is multiple other sub tree suggestions like this arent there?

Already seen people wanting Switzerland and Dutch sub-trees for Germany and both of those seems more likely to happen compared to Argentine

honestly we dont realy care what it ends up, being we only want 1 to solve the issue.
But dutch got denied by Smin very recently

And he today reaffirmed the current standpoint on argentinia


Take that as you will, the only thing we know of switzerland is that it isnt impossible

First of all, this proposal is cherry picking. Mirage3/5, Super Etendard, Kfir, F-16, A-4… ahhhh fuck
If you want to get the Mirage, grind the French TT, and if you want the F-16, grind the American or Taiwanese TT.

its the vehicles argentinia uses, argentinia was today reaffirmed to be in germanys tree. So whats your point?

I mean italian is gonna get a hungarian air tree, could argue they shouldnt get it and players should just research russia and sweden as well

1 Like

For the first pic, he mentions how “We do not plan to add aircraft from the Netherlands to Germany”
It could be because of the question asked but he only said “aircraft” and didn’t mention a Ground vehicle + didn’t specify that it would never happen but just said there isn’t a plan for it

But i’m probably just overthinking it cause everytime i read something like that, it tends to change in a year or so, and it’s always something like: “There wasn’t plans of it at that moment but now there is”

I’m curious if argentine aircrafts will be added tho, only thing that i can see being added there is the PAMPAS and PUCARA


As far as I’m aware, you can’t make subtree suggestions for specific nations, just general subtree suggestions. But I might make one.

i mean Chilean Air Forces Sub-Tree
Chilean Ground Forces Sub-tree

1 Like

It is possible, the rules say that you cannot put it in the title, for example you cannot put “Argentine sub tree for Germany” as a suggestion title, I would still recommend doing a survey with different options so that people can choose where they would prefer to see the sub tree.

3 Likes

The Argentine F-86F 30/40 were tested with the Shafrir II

As far as I know they never used Shafrir I

Spoiler

sabreshafrir

1 Like

Ah, good to know. Admittedly, my knowledge of Argentine aircraft is pretty limited, most good sources are unsurprisingly in Spanish.

1 Like

However, you had a great idea here. You should make a suggestion!

1 Like

F16 unnecessary, and too many a4, find 2 variants to keep lol. Also the really modernized one is more 10.7 than 10.3 to me NGL. Other than that looks pretty cool, nice work

1 Like