But im talking in game ? Im not saying the thing didn’t exist. Im saying the version ingame is 100% fake and following popular demand or following the 105 tiger and Panther II. It would be removed. Also idc but still replying , cope about it bro. Bringing the E-100 in wouldn’t change anything anyway
Not really.
If you look at the suggestion rules, again, you’ll see that what’s required is just one part unique to the vehicle.
The E-100 hull is unique to the vehicle, so it qualifies.
The Tiger II 105 is a different story. The hull is that of a Tiger II’s, not exclusive, so it’s not a qualification criterion. The gun existed in PaK form, but a KwK form was never built in metal, so that’s also out. And so on and so forth.
Basically Gaijin, when creating the 105, combined three different proposed upgrades for the regular Tiger II, which were not at any stage explicitly planned to be mounted together, and of which only one went maybe past the paper stage (the range finder). So of course there’s nothing unique to it in metal. It was not an incomplete vehicle, like the E-100, it was a series of three separate programmes.
3 Likes
But then we have Naval with it own special rule then , since it is naval.
Why do you guys keep bringing in vehicle from other game mode just to argue about realistic stuff into a conversation about the Yak-9K ? It doesn’t make sense, this thread has been up for 6 months and nothing has changed. Why keep bringing in other clearly hasn’t been fully created in like it matter ? It clearly not and to Gaijin themself is even less matter
I agree with you, actually. I even said so earlier. I was just clarifying that the 105 and the E-100 are in very different situations. This is what I said earlier about naval:
Well, people look for standards, it’s normal. Of course I would always gently remind everyone that Gaijin is a for profit company and WT is their product, so the standards are what they say they are and they can change any time. But it’s understandable that people try to generalise based on a set of “rules”, it’s a literal human instinct.
1 Like
You only need one part? Never heard of that.
Then what about things like project Kranvagn/Emil or project FV215b? They have been repeatedly rejected for being “fake” with hulls being completed for both of them and projects being scrapped just before the turrets were to be cast.
Kranvagn could go into swedish tree as possibly the only non copypaste heavy tank they could get, standard FV215b could also boost british tree, while FV215b 183 would make a perfect Battle Pass/event vehicle for 6.3-7.0 BR range.
1 Like
Take a look yourself:
What constitutes a paper/fictional vehicle:
Vehicle only existed in blueprint/sketch drawing form No major individual, vehicle-specific parts (i.e. guns, powerplants, etc.) of the vehicle were built No parts unique to the vehicle were built Vehicle is a completely made up, unofficial design created by an individualIf the vehicle you planned on suggesting meets the criteria above? In that case, it’s unfortunately a paper/fictional vehicle and as such won’t be accepted as a valid suggestion.
What constitutes an (unfinished) prototype can be either:
Vehicle was (partially) constructed Vehicle-specific parts (i.e. guns, powerplants, etc.) were built A hull was laid downDoes the vehicle you want to suggest meet the criteria above? In that case, you have a more obscure vehicle which at least in some capacity existed in the real world and is therefore a valid vehicle to be suggested.
1 Like
Gaijin is being incredibly inconsistent with those rules to say at least.
If all they need to implement a vehicle is 1 specific part being made, there is an absolute craptone of very cool prototypes to be added, yet they still flood the game with 5 M55s or whatever
1 Like
They’re a business. Their primary interest is maintaining a free hand. They leave themselves just enough flexibility to pace the release of content at their leisure.
Just as an example, look at how the TOG II was added, including an “ideal final form” of the intended design.
1 Like
If anything thats cope on your end, since the hull and such was still made, like the others already pointed out.
And also in game the hull is accurate so its not “100% fake”.
1 Like
“Idc” btw
But he is right , it is their rule. They have broken it multiple time. You know the “We don’t do politic”
Look what happened to the VT-4 that was supposed to be added to Japan. Rule only work when they see fit , if not they are ignored. The Soviet Soyuz , while I agree nerfing it would bring a better experience to the last 5 player playing dead mode. But gaijin clearly doesn’t see it that way, they can be flexible when it come to artificial nerf to balance the game , which they have done a lot of time.
And player opinion clearly does not matter to them anyway. Why bother bringing in what real or not
Then why do you keep answering? :P
Fact its not 100% “fake”
1 Like
Wouldn’t it be 80% fake? Pretty sure it was just the hull and tracks, no engine, or transmission, turret ring, etc
1 Like
Both literally dominate the BR brackets they’re sitting in. One spawn of either by a player with a working brain and at least seven fingers can literally turn a loss into a victory. The both of them are ridiculously overpowered. You’d might actually realize this, if you ever played against them for once.
There is no “well if they had more time” or “if they didn’t get invaded” or “if they tried harder” that would allow them to produce Soyuz. That’s irrelevant to their nationality.
The ships being produced were not using thick homogeneous KCA plates for armor. They lacked the means to produce the specified belt armor plates and had to substitute a stopgap solution.
Well no, since they are still accurate to the vehicle.
Lmfao no wonder someone with stats like that complain about a plane who only has a cannon and no flight performance that would get shredded by any competent SPAA or any enemy fighter. Every single time
lmao - NEVER gonna happen - Why#? Russian! simples. Got to have the advantage at every possible excuse!
You can say that all you like. Doesn’t mean they wouldn’t overcome.
Why do you think the SovetSky is dominating and OP? Give a reason instead of a statement.
I have fought against the yak-9k I really don’t find it to be that problematic. It’s very rare I’m one shot by them. Typically it’s 2-6 rounds minimum in 1-2 passes.
Really depends on the pilot.
Also no, they can’t make a loss a win.
Look man if you want to keep glazing these ridiculously overpowered things that’s fine but you shouldn’t pretend that they’re not broken.
Ships that blow everything else out of the water in firepower and protection, aircraft with very good flight performance and a ridiculously overperforming APHE round with a magic laser cannon are stupid strong and shouldn’t be difficult for people with a few games of playing against them to identify the reasons why.
Another person who doesn’t understand naval… and says the most ridiculous things to make it sound magic.
The current wr is higher in the HMS vanguard than the SovetSky btw