how many work. as most dont or arent specific to the information being cited
So how many of these are from “news” sources (the fact that these are allowed is simply insane), or books that are simply not available and can’t be verified without buying the whole damn works
according to your statement hey how is it fake…
in its current form one with irst wasnt build but planned to be added tp the aircraft omes built did not have irst…so…fake
Why don’t you go and find out for yourself
real platform. fake weapons set.
shouldnt be in game as it wasnt ever armed.
If its got added now, what do we know about it ? Do we just go by assumption? Which would give a plane weapons that we aren’t even sure it can use them ? Like fox 3 on yak130m ?

thats a radar…an aesa so yeah should be able to
Ok where is the details.
Every plane has a radar. One does 270* wide search, other have limited range.
Stop playing the assumption game.
From Flightglobal (Wayback Machine): The Yak-131 strike version will have cockpit and engine armour, a 30mm GSh-301 gun, and either the Phazotron-NIIR Kopyo radar with mechanical or electronic beam scanning, or the Tikhomirov NIIP Osa passive phased-array radar.
Its just says a radar being a radar.
Where is max horizontal scan ?
Max range?
Max Kw ?
How many t/r modules ?
Dont try to be smart here, either you got it or you dont.
idk what you are sayin…the devs played the assumption game on the yak 130 in game…deny it r73 …dont give it flares= low br…where are the details on the aesa radars on the british and italian ef2ks mk2…last time i checked its details were still classified…they is already assumption game played by the devs…why not on the yak130m…why not add it along side its italian variant at the same br
Now the real question is why does this:

get weapons its operating nation never purchased and that have never been mounted operationally, only technically compatible
while this:

doesn’t get its main air-to-air armament nor countermeasures despite them being more often fitted than not

Oh so now we gone to non aesa radar in a plane where many sources says aesa radar.
Ok
Well this thread has run its course
Nope, this is proven to be false, wikipedia prioritizes news sites and media rather than acutal primary or even actual secondary sources
literally this
the MiG-29 flight manual on the MiG-29 wikipedia page is literally from DCS…


