A +/-10 year range would have A P-36 in the same match as sabres.
Historical battle ratings a personal pet peeve of mine, because of just how much they would not work from a gameplay design at all, and are basically fundamentally incompatible with how the game is balanced at the moment.
Make it only 2x KAB and it will be balanced in my opinion
Or keep it as and go to 11.0 with R-73 lmaooo (I am in favor of this)
One has no flares
Have fun fighting Zeros and 109 E-4s in P-36s LMAO
Historical BRs would suck majorly. Every time it is brought up it is immediately obvious how much of a bad idea they would be.
KV-1 vs Pz. IIIE let’s goooo
Speaking of P-51Ds, whos going to the them that the Gloster Meteor and Me-262 entered service about the same time as the the P-51D?
Meanwhile, ZSU23-4M2 VS ME262 let’s goooooooo
Your post claims that Yak-130 came before A-4E, yet you provide proof that A-4E was ahead of its [Yak-130’s] time.
“Ahead of its time.” means it came first, before others.
But as you proved, Yak-130 came over 50 years after A-4.
Also, the A-4E & Yak-130 loadouts are pretty much the same.
Year doesn’t dictate capabilities.
they had the option to add the yak 130M but they did not…yak 130M has flares/chaff pods r73 and similar capabilities to the italian one it can fire fox 3s
Russia Finally Produces a Competitive Lightweight Fighter: Yak-130M Boasts AESA Radar and Advanced Weaponry
better engines and S130 Electronic Warfare Suite
Russia’s upgraded Yak-130M trainer enters flight testing ahead of service with the Aerospace Forces
Imaging pod
Russia announces new milestone for Yak-130M after first test flight.
my theory is they added the yak 130 as it is so they can say that players would not wanna grind two identical planes(maybe wrong as they would have done the addition as they did with the hawk 200s but didn’t )
they didnt add a plane becaue it dont exit and had only its first flight like 2 weeks ago.
so no fake planes, it will creat a scandal with the no brain player. being russia plus being a fake plane with def get reaction and called bais and double standard.
so lets just skip the drama and follow the easy path
Another reason was to give russia a proper CAS between those BRs (8.0-9.7) which russia lacked for ages
The only AGM-62 with MITL is the AGM-62ER/DL on the F/A-18.
YAK 141 is a fake aircraft…
while being the same BR as the skyhawk with none of that. the E also has more thrust stock than the B has spaded. blatant poor balancing.
the A-4B is great for its BR so the E really should be a lot higher, 9.0-9.3 would be logical for the performance bump.
if a yak 130 can slam dunk a skyhawk then imagine what its able to do against 10.0 or even 11.0 aircraft.
not exactly fake, there was four built.
they just never carried weapons because it was cancelled just before the USSR imploded
Was built and flew.
Unlike yak130m who had its first flight like 1 week ago.
And we know nothing about it. Unlike yak141 who got documented many times and has proof.
heres a yak 41 freestyle flying at the 1992 Farnborough air show. It was 1000% real. just unarmed
Yes, it’s almost like Wikipedia is a first stop toward trustworthy information, full of links to primary and secondary sources for further research
lol nope
full of dead URLs that lead nowhere and incorrectly cited sources.
You sure about that?
