This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Because it’s not the same engine. It wasn’t forgotten. And just because you find the Flakpanzer annoying doesn’t mean it needs a change, necessarily. Sometimes you are the one that needs to adapt to your new master (Flakpanzer). The ones who keep playing their T29s, etc, like they’re still the top-dog are the ones suffering the most. Those that respect what the Flakpanzer can do fair better. USA 7.0 simply isn’t dominating anymore when there are Flakpanzers around. Been a good change.
Ok and? The nerf was for ALL Tigers, including the Tiger E (which never existed) and the Tiger II (Sla. 16) (which also never existed).
It needs to change and i’m not the only one complaining, that thing got an unfair buff getting access to APHE rounds WHILE USING THE SAME CANNONS AS THE OSTWIND.
What does the Ostwind have that it can’t get access to APHE also? Or why would a german 37mm AAA cannon get APHE?
Lol i will do like i didn’t hear that.
I adapt to any situations, buddy, what do u think uptiers do? Or what do u think Flogger MLD players Will have to do when they start facing a twin-engine supersonic air superiority aircraft with the best radar for it’s new BR? Well, adapt.
Not the same engine. Also see this topic for why your Ostwind doesn’t have that round:
What are you rambling about.
Again: Tigers’ mobility nerf. It was for ALL Tigers, that includes the removed one (10.5cm).
Then why would a fake and removed AAA get APHE if there’s no real proofs it actually got APHE cuz it isn’t real, lmao
Except it wasn’t, clearly. My 10.5 is zoom zoom zoom. Because it’s not the same engine. Done with your rubbish, Flanker.
Bruh u can’t be THIS stupid to be a veteran.
Tiger II (10.5cm) is a Tiger, right? Tigers’ mobility nerf means Tiger series getting their engines nerfed, which means ALL of them, and again, ALL OF THEM, get the nerf.
The Tiger H1/E don’t have the same engine, and they got nerfed anyway, so what veteran and VIP Magic does the Tiger II (10.5cm) have that it couldn’t get nerfed, huh?
Saying it has a different engine isn’t a excuse cuz Tiger II (Sla. 16) has a different engine than the Tiger II (H) and it got nerfed.
?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pzSVfDdbJVSf
Educate yourself before you wreck yourself, son. Sla has an improved engine - it got corrected. KT 10.5 has an even more powerful engine than the Sla. Nothing more needs to be said. It wasn’t just a nerf to nerf Tigers. It was a correction. They didn’t just sit there and go ‘well damn, we need to nerf all Tigers’.
saying “educate before u wreck urself, son” when u didn’t understand nothing i said and keep yapping saying the same stupid things without giving real proofs of it being as u say is a very childish behaviour.
the KT 10.5cm isn’t real, such as the Sla.16, the Sla.16 got it’s hp nerfed but not it’s top speed, which is a very obvious and unfair temptation of buying it since it has better top speed than all Tiger IIs.
KT 10.5cm has a powerful engine with 900hp because it’s heavy asf due to the extra crew member and the bigger cannon, the problem is that it didn’t get nerfed or even touched by this Tigers’ mobility nerf even when it’s a Tiger like all the other ones.
the fact u have a*tism and think i said “KT 10.5cm got nerfed” and not “KT 10.5cm SHOULD have gotten nerfed cuz it’s a Tiger and the nerf was literally for Tigers, even including the swedish one” is not an excuse to preserve ur precious roaring kitty on steroids without nerfs and only buffs like the one that improved the main APCBC shell of it.
that nerf was unnecessary cuz there’s no ingame mechanic that makes the german engines “break” like irl, and the governors used for the KTs was to improve the engine’s life-time, which doesn’t exist ingame cuz the only thing that can “kill” ur engine is a random projectile with +80mm of pen.
the ORIGINAL King Tigers had 700hp and 3000RPM, but soon the germans noticed the life-time of the engines was extremely short due to the massive weight of the tanks, so they added the governor for some of them to improve it’s life-time, making them last longer in battle but reducing their power to 600hp and 2500RPM. the thing is, not all KTs had the governor, so nerfing the KTs ingame just cuz SOME OF THEM (NOT ALL OF THEM) had this addition when they could just let the original Tiger IIs without the governor is unfair, specially knowing how heavy this tanks are and how bad acceleration they have compared with slower heavy tanks with better acceleration like the T34 or IS-2.
You do realize that 1/2 the WW2 brit arsenal has govenors already… Wana guess why that is? Engine lifespan.
yeah u just copy-pasted what i said with other words.
life-time (or lifespan, idk how to say it, im not american) is something that doesn’t exist ingame cuz there’s no “breaking mechanic” that makes ur engine turn yellow, orange, red or black when u play for a long time with the same tank, so nerfing that or giving governors to tanks which don’t have any digital issue within the game is unfair for everyone.
You are only concerned when it effects tanks you play. Its been in the game for almost the entire ground force history. That it now gets applied to the tiger 2 is where you draw the line? Nah, its staying.
yup u truly don’t understand what im saying and u’re just complaining about me cuz im yapping about “the tank i play is getting nerfed” when IRL (what Gaijin uses to add things to the game if u didn’t know) not all Tiger IIs used a governor, which means that the KT shouldn’t have a governor in game since the majority of them didn’t have it irl.
plus as i said and u didn’t hear, there’s no “breaking mechanic” ingame that makes a governor useful in a match, it’s just a nerf for a tank that already had bad mobility due to the weight. cmon u can’t be real, even a T34 has better mobility than the old KT with 700hp.
And the T34 has far worse firepower. The Tiger 2H is still the best 6.7 and its not even close.
Every one of your excuses applies to the centurion. Yet its been in the game since brit release. Its staying.
lmao worse firepower? that solid APCBC can penetrate the Jagdtiger from the front and penetrate the hull of the Tiger II (H) at ~100m.
that worse firepower u’re talking about depends on the T34’s player. if u’re facing a KT from the side u aren’t going to shoot the turret, u’re obviously shooting the ammo rack.
btw the T34 has technically better armor + 3x12.7mm against that sh*tty 2x7.92mm MGs, and as i said: better mobility, which compensates that “bad firepower” u’re yapping about.
If you are actually trying to argue the T34 is as good as the tiger 2 you are wildly delusional. Not in firepower, armor, or speed. You have literally no experience, so please stop posting. You are just making yourself look sillier and sillier.