Then why would a fake and removed AAA get APHE if there’s no real proofs it actually got APHE cuz it isn’t real, lmao
Except it wasn’t, clearly. My 10.5 is zoom zoom zoom. Because it’s not the same engine. Done with your rubbish, Flanker.
Bruh u can’t be THIS stupid to be a veteran.
Tiger II (10.5cm) is a Tiger, right? Tigers’ mobility nerf means Tiger series getting their engines nerfed, which means ALL of them, and again, ALL OF THEM, get the nerf.
The Tiger H1/E don’t have the same engine, and they got nerfed anyway, so what veteran and VIP Magic does the Tiger II (10.5cm) have that it couldn’t get nerfed, huh?
Saying it has a different engine isn’t a excuse cuz Tiger II (Sla. 16) has a different engine than the Tiger II (H) and it got nerfed.
?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pzSVfDdbJVSf
Educate yourself before you wreck yourself, son. Sla has an improved engine - it got corrected. KT 10.5 has an even more powerful engine than the Sla. Nothing more needs to be said. It wasn’t just a nerf to nerf Tigers. It was a correction. They didn’t just sit there and go ‘well damn, we need to nerf all Tigers’.
saying “educate before u wreck urself, son” when u didn’t understand nothing i said and keep yapping saying the same stupid things without giving real proofs of it being as u say is a very childish behaviour.
the KT 10.5cm isn’t real, such as the Sla.16, the Sla.16 got it’s hp nerfed but not it’s top speed, which is a very obvious and unfair temptation of buying it since it has better top speed than all Tiger IIs.
KT 10.5cm has a powerful engine with 900hp because it’s heavy asf due to the extra crew member and the bigger cannon, the problem is that it didn’t get nerfed or even touched by this Tigers’ mobility nerf even when it’s a Tiger like all the other ones.
the fact u have a*tism and think i said “KT 10.5cm got nerfed” and not “KT 10.5cm SHOULD have gotten nerfed cuz it’s a Tiger and the nerf was literally for Tigers, even including the swedish one” is not an excuse to preserve ur precious roaring kitty on steroids without nerfs and only buffs like the one that improved the main APCBC shell of it.
that nerf was unnecessary cuz there’s no ingame mechanic that makes the german engines “break” like irl, and the governors used for the KTs was to improve the engine’s life-time, which doesn’t exist ingame cuz the only thing that can “kill” ur engine is a random projectile with +80mm of pen.
the ORIGINAL King Tigers had 700hp and 3000RPM, but soon the germans noticed the life-time of the engines was extremely short due to the massive weight of the tanks, so they added the governor for some of them to improve it’s life-time, making them last longer in battle but reducing their power to 600hp and 2500RPM. the thing is, not all KTs had the governor, so nerfing the KTs ingame just cuz SOME OF THEM (NOT ALL OF THEM) had this addition when they could just let the original Tiger IIs without the governor is unfair, specially knowing how heavy this tanks are and how bad acceleration they have compared with slower heavy tanks with better acceleration like the T34 or IS-2.
You do realize that 1/2 the WW2 brit arsenal has govenors already… Wana guess why that is? Engine lifespan.
yeah u just copy-pasted what i said with other words.
life-time (or lifespan, idk how to say it, im not american) is something that doesn’t exist ingame cuz there’s no “breaking mechanic” that makes ur engine turn yellow, orange, red or black when u play for a long time with the same tank, so nerfing that or giving governors to tanks which don’t have any digital issue within the game is unfair for everyone.
You are only concerned when it effects tanks you play. Its been in the game for almost the entire ground force history. That it now gets applied to the tiger 2 is where you draw the line? Nah, its staying.
yup u truly don’t understand what im saying and u’re just complaining about me cuz im yapping about “the tank i play is getting nerfed” when IRL (what Gaijin uses to add things to the game if u didn’t know) not all Tiger IIs used a governor, which means that the KT shouldn’t have a governor in game since the majority of them didn’t have it irl.
plus as i said and u didn’t hear, there’s no “breaking mechanic” ingame that makes a governor useful in a match, it’s just a nerf for a tank that already had bad mobility due to the weight. cmon u can’t be real, even a T34 has better mobility than the old KT with 700hp.
And the T34 has far worse firepower. The Tiger 2H is still the best 6.7 and its not even close.
Every one of your excuses applies to the centurion. Yet its been in the game since brit release. Its staying.
lmao worse firepower? that solid APCBC can penetrate the Jagdtiger from the front and penetrate the hull of the Tiger II (H) at ~100m.
that worse firepower u’re talking about depends on the T34’s player. if u’re facing a KT from the side u aren’t going to shoot the turret, u’re obviously shooting the ammo rack.
btw the T34 has technically better armor + 3x12.7mm against that sh*tty 2x7.92mm MGs, and as i said: better mobility, which compensates that “bad firepower” u’re yapping about.
If you are actually trying to argue the T34 is as good as the tiger 2 you are wildly delusional. Not in firepower, armor, or speed. You have literally no experience, so please stop posting. You are just making yourself look sillier and sillier.
And you said Gepard 1A2. Make up your mind.
lmao i have no experience? nop u can’t force me stop posting, and all im making is myself look more curious and curious about how are u even in the game if u’re this uncapable of understanding simple phrases.
bro, it has amazing firepower and the 3x.50 cals are useful to inmovilize ur enemy if u miss ur first shot, plus the armor is extremely good (u can’t penetrate the UFP of the T34 if u’re playing the KT, u can only pen it with the IS-2 which is kinda weird since the KT has better angle performance than the IS-2 but idk Gaijin’s rules).
saying a tank has bad firepower just cuz it has solid APCBC is like saying ARL-44 is bad at 5.7 cuz it’s 248mm of penetration are solid.
1 Like
The T34 is, in my honest opinion, drastically better than the Tiger II. It has a drastically better penning round, 1.5x the Power to Weight ratio, better reverse speed, better turret armor, and more defensive capabilities against both CAS and Tanks (3x .50 cals makes it easy to take out tracks and planes alike).
I have experience playing both. I have 2 nukes with the T34 and only 1 with the Tiger II, and the one with the Tiger required me to bring out the Ferdinand. So it doesn’t even really count. So yes, in my opinion (and by pure stats) the T34 is better than the Tiger II.
1 Like
You have never played the T34, in fact you are nowhere close to it. The tiger 2 can pen the turret of a T34 over a large section of the vehicle, the commander cupola is large, and the hull MG. You can also pen the hull 1/2 way down the ufp all the way to the lfp. You have APHE so a single pen is usually lethal where the T34 has only AP. The tiger 2 has nearly double the fire rate and gets smoke launchers to make the T34’s necessity of a 2nd pen even more difficult.
@cmdrVince
8vs 12 isn’t double, along with the tiger 2 having one of the best ground dispersion stats in the game (and has since its release).
I call bullshit on getting plane kills with a hull or coax mg on a vehicle with a 3 degree vertical traverse rate. The top .50 is the only thing you are hitting planes with.
1 Like
literally just what i said: if u have a solid APCBC (like most american and french tanks), u’re obviously not going to shoot to the center of mass of anything, u’re going to look for weakspots, and that’s why some solid APCBC shells are better than APCBC with explosive filler.
irl, solid APCBC shells have better penetration due to not using any explosive inside that takes part of poorly limited space the shell has, which means they can be filled with more steel than normal and giving them impressive pen performance.
i played against it using Tiger II which is the tank u’re yapping is “EXTREMELY OP”.
prove it.
lmao the cupola is as small as the KT’s one and the MG port is not always a secured kill due to the trolly armor around the same MG.
u can only pen the LFP, the UFP is harder to pen and u can only do it around 400/300m.
skill issue, french players use solid APCBC in 99% of their tanks and they aren’t bad for it.
IS-2 looking from a corner after hearing double the fire rate:
i admit it lacks smoke grenades, but tbh it doesn’t mean it’s bad. T-55A doesn’t have smoke grenades too and only has ESS which is absurdly bad since TVD can look through it and it blinds u too.
also skill issue if u can’t one tap a target with a 120mm solid APCBC while everyone else uses 75/88/90/100mm cannons.