so riddle me this:
how is a fox-1 missile that generally has less range than a fox-3 and that has to be guided until impact better than a missile that can be fired and then you can just turn away, becasue the missile will do its own thing
it is only supirior if the person firing the aim-120 keeps flying towards you
1 Like
I never compared them. I simply proved that one can compete with fox 3. At no point did i state an analysis about them. If you want to do that you are free to.
Thank you
are you sure
your own words:
Did i provide an analysis? I did defend the point with a video, that’s how most claims should work.
and yet you failed to see the most important part between a fox-1 and a fox-3
the fox-1 has to be guided with a radar lock until it hits
a fox-3 dosent, it will still be able to hit you even after the radar of the launch aircraft isnt seeing you anymore
What are we talking about. I dont have to believe you. I have the full right to provide a counter claim about a game that i enjoy and provide evidence.
the difference between fox-1 and fox-3 missile is nothing that needs to be proven becasue they are facts
the tactical differences between them are also aparent
first of all you dont need to hard lock a person to fire a fox-3 at them, but you have to do it for a fox-1 making it way easier to notice when you are getting launched at and start to defend
ontop of that a fox-3 missile dosent need to be guided all the way by whoever launched it, giving the person who launched it an advantage, becasue he can start to defend against your fox-1 missile while you either have to break lock to defend against the fox-3 or you continue to guide it and die to a fox-3 missile
Youre explaining game mechanics. The statement that i countered was the fox3 dominate 13.0. In my mind that would mean that i should lose most engagements to fox 3 capable aircraft. I fought against the claim by showing how to evade fox 3 missiles like the aim120 and derby. I made it to the merge in both videos. My game play at 13.0 doesnt include constant loses as you can see in my kd. I fought the point that fox3 control 13.0 and i find that false.
This community has been nothing but rude. I defend a point with concrete evidence and offer assistance. Then i’m met with sarcasm. I play a lot of gen 4 because i like to dogfight. I play a lot of gen 4 because it takes skill. I recently bought the sniper to see how bad the flight model really is. After 1 month that is my kd. Why did you have to ego trip off of high tier for no reason?
🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀
Useless argument
Topic of post is useless anyways su27 never being moved down anymore
why not
1 Like
Good question
A 13.3 bracket has been added
And Gaijin won’t bother to move anything down
So instead of bringing the su27 down they just balanced redside by giving them nato planes. Got it…
Makes sense. Here’s an f18, you get an f18 and you too.
Watch migan fox use the R27s.
Lock any target
Fire from 40km, unlock
Keep.on TWS if poss
Use missile cam
Relock just before missile hits- profit
R27er is nasty
Spamrams not so much
this requires the enemy doesnt do much in the meantime
Used at start of game its more effective than spamming fox 3 vs decent players.
Remember it doesnt matter who you shoot at or who ends up eating it. Theres no warning on the way unlike fox 3
1 player gets a 1 second warning and another 1 second warning to update missile on its travel, if done right they dont even have time to notch…
Also iv notched spamrams from under 4km when at height and fired straight at me. Not doing this ever vs R27Ers