Why no Su27S flanker at 13.0 yet?

These kind of comments are unnecessary and counterproductive. Do you want to persuade the person you’re talking to, present valid points or do you want to get likes and divide the playerbase?

He’s right though, but now it’s irrelevant since a 13.3 bracket will be introduced very soon, and this outcome is good enough to satisfy me.

2 Likes

Can’t wait for 13.3, finally a good reason to spade the 29smt

1 Like

13.3 bracket was the best solution, sadly they removed 12.7 bracket for no reason and we have yet to wait for 13.7 or 14.0 bracket.

At least they also added 12.3 bracket.

1 Like

13.3 will also get 2 rotations where it sits at the very top, which makes it very beneficial

13.0 planes are gonna be eating good

Also why is the Chinese f16 13.3? Imo should go to 13.7 because it has tws and ground strike

13.3 bracket wouldn’t be balanced if either MiG-29SMT didn’t get moved up to 13.7 or F-16s didn’t get AMRAAMs. Miraculously Gaijin didn’t fail this time.

13.0 will be a ghost BR, because everyone will play Su-27s and MiG-29SMT at 13.3, no one will play 12.7 MiG-29 at 13.0. 13.3 will be very popular.

Other F-16s will also get TWS, because they get AMRAAMs.

and be a worse F16AM?
MLU will probably get only gets 4 amraams.
no irccm missiles (so only aim9L).
No HMD or HMS and only 60 countermeasures.

Apparently they were forced to do it due to the top BR increase because the top bracket would’ve stretched too much. If this is correct we will get a new bracket when 14.7 is introduced.

They could’ve just said this a year ago. I stopped spending money in WT due to this.

I don’t see why the MLU would only get 4 amraams… It’s a MLU not adf

I take that back, I forgot there will be no 12.7 bracket anymore lmao.

It’s still better than the Thai ocu which is at 13.7, it gets 15 more cms than that thing

OCU is incredibly mid, but it at least has an HMD and we still don’t know the MLU’s fox-3s amount for certain, it could 2, it could 4 or could be 6

ocu it doesn’t get radar hmd, only ir hmd so like it’s still pretty much the same imo
image
mlu im pretty sure is 6, ill find a pic of it


taiwan never had the aim 120a, only the c from the c-5, so kinda funny they’re adding the a amraam, but ig it’s probably still compatible with it.
Since this is now stage 2 f-16 instead of stage 1 (as it’s getting amraams instead of being locked to 7m) it can now also get hmd, agm 65gs, lantirn and gbu 10s. It should also be changed to 120 cms but i dont think theyre going to do that

Idk, to be honest i don’t think mlu should go to 13.7 just because it gets tws and the other don’t, the lack of HMD still severely handicaps the aircraft when fighting against opponents such as rafale, eurofighter or Su30SM.

and the lack of HMD doesn’t help either when you have an already mediocre missile such as the amraam (in terms of maneuverability).

Not even the acm makes up for the lack of HMD, as (iirc) it’s a small normal square, and not the tall box found in F2A or su34 which could have mitigated it’s disadvantage.

A2G is not an argument either, because as of currently the best a2g ordnance that the MLU gets is just 6 AGM 65Bs, without even a targeting pod, which as you can imagine, is not ideal when fighting in top tier battles.

Well, it’s going to be the same as the ocu basically, and ocu is at 13.7 so i dont see why the mlu will be at 13.3


also f16 adf also gets tall box so i dont see the issue