Yeah. I found that 90% of the time, hits to the ERA, just turned the ERA black but could always pen the “Armour”. but no guarantee that a pen round does any damage.
İ agree.
Thats why i prefer to shoot either their gun breach,lower plate or their driver port if they sits right in front of me.
I actually hit one in the gun breach, direct hit, gun breach went yellow, one tapped me in return. either way, probably needs to go up to 10.3 these days.
That type of bs happens to me on many different tanks tbh so i cant exactly blame only russian tanks on that.
However increasing turms br is fine for me cause im already using my turms with my t80b.
1 Like
wut
In my experience, the L23A1 just turns the ERA black with no penetration. The only way to kill a T-72 TURMS in front aspect is to aim at the gun breach or below the ERA panels on the front. It is pointless to try and pen the side of the turret or the main ERA plate on the front. Protection analysis completely lies about this though.
Do you have it? In a t72 av your team mates will rush to the cap before and u get 0 sp, and all enemy team rush to middle of the map and camp snipe points before you can do anything. In rush meta this tank is bad and armor means nothing all other tanks have rounds to 1 shot you.
I’m pretty sure that the Wolfpack was 10.0, or close to 10.0 already before it had M900. The round must be a recent addition, as they haven’t even updated the article. My guess is that it will go up in BR given Gaijin’s historical treatment of over-performing American vehicles.
The wiki is extremely out of date. Both the wolf pack and the TT variant both have M900. The turms is fine where it is.
Over-performing vehicles of all nations.*
But I haven’t seen Wolfpack over-performing.
A question about the T-72AV. Can the 3BM42 actually fire? I don’t know where I read that the barrel is ament
2A46M could not resist the pressure of the 3BM42 bullet and that is why that bullet is fired by the T-72B with the 2A46M-1 cannon, which does withstand the pressure.
Because its russian.
2 Likes
I like getting constantly messed over by TURMS while playing my 9.0-9.3 Japan lineup…
Even the Type-93 “lolpen” APFSDS gets eaten by K1 ERA despite armour inspection showing it could pen.
2 Likes
The premium Leo 2 has everything better but 0.3 br higher. The turms has very very poor maneuverability, bad gun depression, and bad armor for the battle rating (DM-23 can go straight through frontal plate). If anything it should be 9.7.
9.7 lmao.
It absolutely should not be below 10.0.
2 Likes
The M1A1 is much better and sits at 11.0 that’s why 10.7 is fine.
2 Likes
Don’t forget about the Type 90 and TKX (P)
2 Likes
Wolfpack was at 9.7, before it was given M900.
i mean… compare it with Leopart 2A4 and you`ll get why…
it lacks mobility, turret rotation and vertical aim speed, has longer reload even tho it has autoloader, it has poor aim angles which is REALLY bad at that BR, it has random (if not just BAD) damage, and it also lacks survivability. Sure some cannons of same rank wont pen its hull (L7 on M1 Abrams for example), but then some of them pen it straight to hull (nearly all 120mm shots, L7 with M900 or DM63, ect), and the damage it takes is much more lethal than leopard usually gets.
2 Likes
Armour? It has the armour of a 9.3 tank with K1 ontop. It’s contemporaries can literally UFP it.
3 Likes