Why is F-5C at 11.0

With which models of sidewinder? Even 9X?

Theoretically yes if it has the same dimensions as prior models. I would need to research it tho.

Lol yeah if it mounted them in service I see no issue

Yes?

And thats why such additions are the exception and not the rule. We dont see every plane rocking the maximum theoretical weapons loudouts.

F-5C with flares is as a configuration just not that big of a leap. Id preffer if they gave a historically accurate depiction of some F-5C aircraft without flares, as thats the configuration it had. But alsonidk how people would take a F-5C without flares at a BR similar to the T-2

Then why do you keep wasting my time?

I clearly stated that i dont care if F-5C gets better missiles nor support it, i talked about how rails could support multiple variants of Sidewinders which is true.

Show me an accurate sources where it states it can.

You kept claiming French rails are compatible with all sidewinders but i dont see any credible sources aside from some claims.

it never did, the F-86F-40 was the first Sabre to get the AIM-9B. If you want an American Sabre with AIM-9B’s, that would be the F-86H

image

this is my last game in F5C from today

1 Like

image

4x AIM-9Bs

2x Magic 1s

You can find images of both on other frech jets. There are no documents because of French 50 years of secrecy.

Ah ok nvm

1 Like

I find flares acceptable on the F-5C because it would be a lower BR without them. Save the 9.Xs lol.

Yeah i dont care about single photo since those Crusaders bought from Usa and its possible that it was taken before domestic modifications.

Im asking an official documents that states french rails are compatible with all sidewinder models.

If you dont have anything other than some random photos then dont waste my time please

Read my posts thanks

As i expected its nothing but claim.

Ngl that second photo looks photoshopped… But I’ll take your word that it’s not

image

Gotchu

You know funnily enough you’re in this post too.

Why would the Belgians heavily modify their pylons on a combat capable aircraft in service? It’s because they didn’t have to.

Ight. Idk what it is about it… But it really did

Any solid proof aside from some random claims?

It was known that this plane was heavily modified and had nothing to do with normal block-15, but knowing you will keep claiming the same thing.

Yeah looking at it now it’s kinda weird must be exposure or somthin.

Now do YOU have a credible source