4th time still haven’t answered how you’re going to catch an F-104. Also you… do realize that if he misses with his gun, he can just… continue to fly away right?
Not everyone, just you.
You’re the person strawmanning here. When told about how the F-104 can simply outrun, you strawman with “aktually you can just shoot it”. As if any plane with a gun can’t. Meanwhile completely ignoring the point that unless the F-104 blunders, you won’t have a shot on him.
Eeh, I never thought mentioning what you did last time similarly, just like how you did this time, can be strawmanning.
Unless you are a scarecrow.
:/
Then maybe don’t fly in a straight line? F-104s perform terribly in headons.
Yet, you think that everyone who doesn’t struggle against an F-104 is just lying.
Lemme clue you in on something. If you don’t wanna keep dying pathetic avoidable deaths to a weak plane, the best thing you can do is realize the deaths are fully avoidable.
XD using the “no u” argument when you don’t even know what strawman means.
Where did I say that? Crazy how you’re putting words in people’s mouths. If you want to lie, as least make it believable.
Buddy, they were your own words.
If they’re my words, why can’t you quote them right now? Where did I say “everyone who doesn’t struggle against an F-104 is lying?”
Do you struggle with remembering things?
Nice misquotation fallacy. I said you lie, you then twist it to say everyone lies.
Buddy that’s two entirely different sentences. If you want to attack me, at least do a proper job at it.
That is not what I said.
Let’s use this as a learning experience, your comment is an example of a strawman argument.
Nice strawman right there, immediate deflection to another topic upon inquiry on where i said everyone lie.
also
Exactly what you said.
For a guy who calls everyone else as strawmanning, you sure have a lot of this going on.
Like how many times are you going call everyone a strawman? a whole year is ridiculous. This is like “boy who cries wolf”, you do it enough and it loses value. Attacks and deflections without bringing any relevant information to the topic at hand.
no sabre is 9.3 anymore
Get’s mad that they have no argument, so they stalk my account. Nothing of surprise tbh.
Respectfully, if you have nothing to add but attacks and “strawman” claims, you should move on. Every time we ask something of you, you keep deflecting about how it’s not your job to prove anything. It’s not helpful or conductive to the conversation, other than highlighting that you’re a known bad sport.
The original post didn’t specify. But even so, just one step of difference from 9.0 to 9.3 means they’d still see each other almost every match.
F-104C isn’t better than F-104A in any real way to make it 9.7
Two more missiles and rocket pods to serve as impromptu flares. Especially now that rocket pods have no speed limit.
2 more aim-9b isnt a real reason to uptier it, neither are rocket pods
Buddy, every single argument you have made falls into:
It’s too hard!!!
or
That’s not true!!! (with 0 backing to your point)
or just personal attacks.
You for some reason don’t want to accept the reality that someone else (most people) doesn’t struggle to fight F-104s, and so you just toss around insults and baseless “counterarguments” that consist of rejecting reality. You come in with a faulty opinion, someone tells you how silly it is, then you scramble to find anecdotal evidence that supports your claim cause you know nothing valid or logical supports you.
Why would having flares not be a reason to uptier it?