Why exactly are the Chieftain's at 8.7? Either decompress the 7.7 to 9.7 BR range or decrease the Chieftain's (and any similarly suffering vehicles) BR to 8.3

[An_Pigeon]

@TheDudesRug

His only hope then was to try get a nuke or move his slow-ass out of the hull down position into a city that he had given us time to set up in. So yes, the whole hull down thing can be great to farm kills, but not always getting the win. If you actually take the time to set up in a position that denies vital (aka caps) territory, sure, but I guess not every map provides that hull down location you like at the exact location you want it.

I mean chieftains move at 48KMPH reliably so it’s not that slow, not like an M103 or something.

not every map has a hulldown location for the Mk10 or even the mk3/5 but they are still reliably strong tanks when used properly, methodically basically.

@TheDudesRug

China really brings the goods at this BR by giving its MBTs not only a roof mounted 12.7, but HE-VT rounds for the main gun.

ZTZ88A /B as well as the T69G II are some of my favourite tanks in the game, absolutely love when someone else actually values them for what they are.
the HEVT round as well absolutely slaps for jet or heli take downs.

@TheDudesRug

Edit: Just to reiterate, I do enjoy the Chieftain Mk10, but the mobility issues keep me from using it more often. If you like its style of play, I’m sure the mobility is less of an issue for you.

I fall under the bias of absolutely loving chieftains, I know it’s a slower vehicle, it just requires a more maticulous approach to the battlefield, some maps just suck for it right enough

[Jarms]

Sadly it’s been confirmed the Chieftain Mk 5 is the very first models to leave the factory, which means no LRF. Even if they were installed approximately 3 months later, and all new production tanks thereafter had this base.

[An_Pigeon]

@Jarms

Sadly it’s been confirmed the Chieftain Mk 5 is the very first models to leave the factory, which means no LRF.

Then they can add a designation folder it and give us oje with a lrf…
The bug report was accepted

[Jarms]

They closed it.

[An_Pigeon]

When??? Why close it after accepting it.

By all standards rhe our chieftain mk3 moves too fast its as if its a mk3/3, i think it was.

The mk10 has the L23 which is a false round snd accepted.

Shir2 has access to any form of dart which is a total joke as it was cancelled over a half decade before Britain designed one.

This is a joke

Edit
Also I’m not directing any of this at you! Apologies if it seems that way

[l2ulan]

First look is done by a Tech Mod, who passes it up the chain. If a Senior Tech Mod or Dev then refuses it, the Accepted gets removed and the report gets Not A Bug.

Cover

Chieftain Mk 5 was the last factory-produced mark. It carried either the No 59 Mk 1 daysight, or the TLS No 1 Mk 1, so Gaijin has an option to deny the LRF for balancing.

Trouble is that both the No 59 Mk 1 and the TLS are 10x sights, and the Chieftain Mk 5 still has 7x-8x copied over from the Mk 3. The 7x is from the Gunner’s auxiliary sight, the No 70 Mk 2.

Report can be seen here; Chieftain Mk 5 incorrect gunner’s magnification

[An_Pigeon]

@l2ulan

ccepted gets removed and the report gets Not A Bug

Bit stupid that

@l2ulan

Chieftain Mk 5 was the last factory-produced mark. It carried either the No 59 Mk 1 daysight, or the TLS No 1 Mk 1, so Gaijin has an option to deny the LRF for balancing.

Im aware of that however then why does the SHIR2 have any access to an APFSDS round which didn’t exist until over 5 years after the program was cancelled.

@l2ulan

Trouble is that both the No 59 Mk 1 and the TLS are 10x sights, and the Chieftain Mk 5 still has 7x-8x copied over from the Mk 3. The 7x is from the Gunner’s auxiliary sight, the No 70 Mk 2.

The L15A5 is the same issue straight copy paste.