It is important on quite a few WT maps, and it prevents eastern tanks from being as useful.
I proved you wrong, and you respond with cope?
Look a the protection analysis and tell me that again.
So you want a nerf to any stabilizer that isn’t modern? I fully know that shermans don’t have stable guns like they do in WT, but I haven’t seen anyone asking for a nerf.
I said cope because we’re comparing T-series to the Leopards and you bring up the Leclercs and Type 10 like they matter. It’s an extremely dishonest reply meant to deflect and therefore it’s cope.
I don’t care what the protection analysis says. Take the T90M 10mm RHA breech cover. That thing routinely eats DM53 like it’s nothing but according to the tool it does nothing? Vatnik please.
I was just pointing out that that isn’t a unique feature, even the leopards can lose 1 crew and still have their best reload.
Yes that’s my player card. What’s your point?
Commander being alive and full health has an impact on reload rate through leadership and their own reload skills. Guess I shouldn’t be surprised a bias apologist doesn’t know this at 12k battles, ain’t like you need to know what you’re doing
You are right about that, but the difference is fairly negligible.
Considering you have 25,000 battles underneath your belt I would expect The stats to be further apart than this. So where exactly did I error when I said I’m a pretty good player?
I would also like to point out I don’t get the easy stat boost of using aircraft. im Strictly ground.
Regardless of the petty jab you decided to shoot my way. Entire point of my comment this seems to be totally ignored due to someone feeling the need to penis measure for some reason. I’ll rephrase for those who have the inability to understand messages besides The very words in front of them
As someone who’s mained Sweden, I would not feel that they are overpowered, there tanks lack armor and are killed Quite easily at almost every BR. I’ve only made it to 10.7 so far and I always feel like every BR I’m in my tanks are made of paper mache.
It’s not negligible. The Leo commander not being full health pretty much guarantees you won’t reload faster than a T-series. Guess that doesn’t matter now too?
Of course. You are having a meltdown over T-tanks being brokenly OP and biased, but your stats are directly countering that.
Claims something is OP
Performs below his account average with it
Yeah buddy, how about you tell us the real reason behind the meltdown, because in game performance surely isn’t it.
Calling 90M to be more mobile than 2A7 in any way is pretty delusional.
[Insert metric] isn’t important because I say so. Delusions at their finest.
The amount of false information you’re spewing out is incredible. Those tanks don’t have flat turret roofs, so you can consistently get their breech/gunner/commander without them even having a chance to shoot.
Reading this is funny after so much ignorance from your behalf.
Good thing commander is the most protected crew member in those tanks. They sit in line behind both driver and gunner, so most frontal shots that kill your commander would outright kill your tank.
Same thing goes for being shot from the side. You’ll most likely lose another crew member alongside the commander. Having two crew with increased reload is much better than having a single crew member back in your hangar.
So yeah, in most of those scenarios where your reload would get hampered you’d be dead or barely alive (pro of having a extra crew).
My stats on one top tier tank without thermals are meaningless, especially when I play it like a monkey and take advantage of the stalinium. I do like how you vatniks invariably always fetch my stats and call it out like it’s some gotcha when my experience in the T80-UM2 literally proves me right, i.e. I just drive out in the open and tank a ridiculous amount of hits without even trying, then 1 death leave since I don’t have a line up to go with it
As for the rest of your drivel
T90M is more mobile, you’re dishonest
T-series have enough depression to make it work, and they don’t need it as much as NATO tanks due to their superior hull down protection
And I do know the game better than you, though I’m not pathetic enough to bother checking your stats, pretty obvious they’ll be laughable anyway despite you relying on OP nations.
And I just noticed that second message lmao, just more bambi rambling. The more you post the more it makes sense why you need bias.
Your error was saying that you were a good player to begin with lol.
Your stats don’t support it.
Poor guy needs 45 minutes to type a reply and it’s still worthless
Oh so thermals will outweigh all that bias OP armor and shell-eating autoloader. Good to know.
All that OP bias stalinium with 6.5s of constant reload while shooting at lolpen enemies only gave you 1.5 K/D. That’s rather interesting.
As I already said, your personal opinions won’t change facts.
First of all, Leopard 2s have the best turret armor in the game, you’re probably the only person that doesn’t acknowledge that. Not knowing this is just a you problem.
Second of all, all that “superior hull down protection” won’t help much if you can’t lay your gun on the target at all, which is the whole point of gun depression.
I actually try to play nations before I express my opinions on them. All those that I’ve played (USSR/US/GER/SWE/UK) are decent with UK lagging behind. Have yet to see that bias in action though.
Gets shown that only the commander sustaining damage is an edge case
Instead of conceding, starts deflecting to hide the fact
I’m glad you’re so keenly expecting my replies.
Yes thermals are essential
Yes playing a tank as a joke means I’ll do worse and i still probably outperform you
Ironic
Leopard 2 have a good turret but it’s easier to destroy than T-series from every angle especially with 3OF26.
Having less depression doesn’t mean you can’t go hull down, just gotta pick your location better. Game not doing everything for you? Unfathomable for a vatnik i know.
Not like you’d recognize bias with that dunning kruger and backfiring.
Commander sustaining damage is an edge case… More doublethink.
Yeah I got a spare screen and seeing your name pop up with “replying” for 45 minutes is pretty distracting. It is pretty pathetic though so don’t worry i’ll keep replying since you invest so much effort, don’t want to be too mean
Damn Russian tanks must very suffer fighting against Leopard 2 nowadays lol
Not for a careless rusher that just goes straight into battle picking up engagements 10 seconds after spawning.
You can do 1.5 K/D in basically any tank without effort. Alternating between getting one and two kills per death is not something I’d expect from a shell-eating bias machine, no matter how you play it.
Not only that 2A7s and 122s have better armor profile, they’ll also have better survivability due to ammo compartmentalization, having one extra crew and being less cramped. In case of T-80s, they also have both hull and turret spall liners going for them.
Keep telling yourself stuff that aren’t true.
Commander sustaining damage outside of your tank getting knocked out or losing more than a single crew is an edge case. We already know that playing on two crew is better than being in the hangar.
And in those 45 minutes you couldn’t find a way to remove that distraction by simply opening a new tab ?
I guess your neuron activation is lacking, no wonder you get sucked into conspiracy theories.
Imagine inventing that little scenario about me so you can double-down on a weird claim that thermals don’t matter… It doesn’t really matter what you expect from my stats considering you don’t know my playstyle and are just making weird baseless assumptions to force reality into your perspective.
2A7 and 122 have a larger silhouette and a larger % of that silhouette can be penned regardless of the angle you shoot at them, hull down or not. That’s before you account for the 3OF26 and the rigged damage model.
But for the 3rd time it doesn’t matter to me if the 2A7 is the best tank in the game or just 2nd, that’s literally irrelevant to the broader bias question which involves CAS, SAM, bug reports, damage model, matchmaking, ammunition, map layouts and so on. Finally it’s unreasonable to expect a russian main to recognize bias when he’s only mediocre while relying on it. At the end of the day if we go 10 battles together you’ll come out whining that the Ariete needs a nerf and that it’s the best tank in the game, like a spoiled child.
42% Winrate and 1.6 KD is really screaming op bias, you are right.
You don’t know how to read but at least you know how to fetch
