Isn’t the Prem Sagitario 2 engines?
1 Like
Yeah, hence
It’s also slightly large in dimensions.
Ah alrighty.
Deflection to deflection… Still can’t justify an argument.
That’s why you bought a plane that had a poor cockpit model, right?
Please refer to:
Deflection to deflection… Still can’t justify an argument.
Oh right, it’s a deflection to call out your attempts at a personal attack and a disingenuous representation of my actual argument to actually divert from the topic, I’m supposed to let that slide or I’m the problem.
1 Like
What benefit does anyone derive from defending subpar quality surpassed by hobbyist modders developing free-to-download and use modifications for indie games developed by a mexican marketing team?
We cannot even expect quality to that level?
And why does it matter? Because horrible cockpit textures really ruin the sim experience.
Behold, a free-to-download cockpit for a game developed by mexican marketing folk:
Surely gaijin is capable enough to surpass this mexican marketing team?
5 Likes
Because it makes them feel special, it gets them attention on the internet to oppose a pretty normal opinion with the most absurd and asinine takes on the subject.
Some people think it’s cool to jump to the defense of a company that makes millions of dollars and doesn’t care about them at all on matters that go against their own best interest.
1 Like
How is my representation of your argument “disingenuous”? You’re arguing on the basis of the language in the fictitious cockpit and a lack of textures in the cockpit. I argued on the basis of your expectations of graphics.
It’s called a hyperbole, maybe retake primary school english and get it down better than somebody who’s using it as their third language.
Drop the ace attorney fallacy gun-jumps while you’re at it.
1 Like
In the real world, no one speaks fancy-pants English. Just want to point that out since English morphs over time into variants. Ex: Over in New York, the variant of English we use is blunt and honest straight to the point, with no sugar coating, if you’re dumb, we call it out. Over in places such as Cali->They act nice, but they are not blunt and honest. The same goes for Washington State. Had similar interactions with folks from some of the European countries including Liechtenstein pretty cool honestly.
I’m not defending them? I’ve given the exact reason for their subpar quality and told Miragen multiple times how he can fix this issue.
So far, he refuses to.
His account remains dormant on the Issues tab, there are no suggestions being opened by him.
You absolutely can expect it, it’s why the previously mentioned BI-1 has a fully modelled cockpit… Because people reported on its low quality and shared very clear imagery of its flight deck.
You own neither the Sagittario 2 nor the Ariete.
Miragen owns the Ariete alone. He has never once played a Simulator battle in it.
I own both the Ariete and Sagittario 2. Unlike Miragen, I’m unbothered by the cockpit textures because it isn’t an integral part of the game, nor does it detract from my gameplay experience.
I’d imagine after setting a kill record in the aircraft and tripling his stats in the same game mode I would know the aircraft… And he, playing 50 matches in it, would as well.
You only see one of us complaining about a moot aspect of the cockpit, even when neither of us relied on the cockpit or its systems in-game.
KSP is a pay-to-play game. On Steam it’s $30, on Epic it’s $40.
Then again, anything is free-to-download if you have can torrent it…
I don’t know about you, but if a basic sentence is “fancy-pants English” to you… You probably don’t deserve to be in a public forum.
I absolutely asked. Definitely.
How does this detract from what I said?
1 Like
Just wanna point this is a tad biaed. While you aren’t unbothered other people are.
While I do not, I did get the PBM and any efforts to enjoy it in sim has been seriously tarnished by its abysmal cockpit modelling, including bugs like the co-pilot teleporting outside.
For a battlepass vehicle.
1 Like
It really doesn’t however expect people in a text format to comprehend the concept of a Rhetorical device. If we were speaking vocally it’s easier to discern however in a format spoken in words on a keyboard were it so easy?
If you’re also talking in the text it makes more sense to speak more straight to the point and bluntly than it would if you’re trying to fancify the words. Hence Fancy pants.
And the seemingly bothered people have made it quite clear that they have no intent to better their experience… Searching through both here and the old forum, I can’t find any other person complaining about the cockpit textures. Going through the Issues page the only complaints I can find are of inaccurate dials.
He has a myriad of posts going out of his way to complain about things that only he cares about, yet as said before, I can’t find a single topic in the Issues page with his name under the title.
Try finding me one post in the bug report / suggestions filter that Miragen has made… It’s pretty clear what his stance is on bettering the game.
I’m not personally bothered because the Ariete cockpit has no sway in any form of gameplay. Early pictures of its prototype stages shows it with an entirely different and far more fitting HUD for the aircraft… As said, I can see that being high on the list of issues yet I don’t see myself going out of my way to research its accessories and make a bug report.
Miragen, on the other hand…? Nothing about his complaining is about the function of the aircraft or gameplay at all. Nothing that he has complained about here will affect his already poor performance in the aircraft, and nothing he has said here was said with the hopes of constructive change.
Just saying, I don’t disagree nor do I agree either. I mean I have the guy ignored cause some of the claims for things he doesn’t own nor fight are…ludicrous/foolish since they are based on emotional discretion rather than reason.
However point is, that some people are bothered by the lack of poorly modeled cockpits. Since some of us come for immersion.
Oh someone has an issue I don’t have, must mean his issue is stupid!
You don’t have an issue with a crappy cockpit, good for you lil buddy! I do.
I’m personally not a fan of bombers in simulator, though from what I’ve seen in my test drive for my PBM-5A Mariner it’s a hot pile of trash. I feel cockpit details are far below on the list of issues to be fixed, mostly trumped by DM and gunner issues.
Apart from that, though… A glass to see through and a bombsight is all that I would functionally need. Beyond my complaint of the bomb sight being the same as it was in 2009 and can use a little bit of work for a more seamless feel, it’s a working model in the respect that you can see out the front and drop bombs down below.
The issue is some bombers haven’t gotten a proper cockpit since 2012.
A very obvious hyperbole was taken as a “strawman argument”.
There is no lack of comprehension, that’s a blatant finger point because he felt an issue with my overexaggeration of a moot argument.
Understandable. I’ve seen people go out of their way to attack a choice of words because it’s “complicated”, hence I thought you meant that in terms of “fancy pants”.