That’s why you get good with what you use…
Yea, no… I’d rather not have aiming assistance implemented in RB, as that’s why I play RB… No markers, no lead indicators…
And this is where you need to make your decisions and plan your play… Sorry, but there’s nothing here that makes any point other than you not being able to hide.
And you also show the point I made earlier, that anything said about things, gets another scenario made…
I don’t have to be a doctor to use the moniker… I don’t know why children don’t actually comprehend this.
You can’t because I was dropping those from beyond their effective range, and they’re open tops so the accuracy needed was minimal.
A plane stands the best chance at intercepting a plane before they reach the battlefield and surviving the encounter. Thus it is the only truly good option.
Yes, you’ll ward me off for a minute or two before I come up with a path that lets me blow up your SPAA with a more creative strategy. Like the many M163s that got rocketed by my J2M3 by just doing a corkscrew over them and messing with their controls.
A team that suddenly experienced half their enemies dying before ever seeing them, and thus those enemies were forced to take worse vehicles or just leave the match.
Best part is when they spawn 3-5 SPAAs to later die to tanks and actually lose the game.
People say this commonly, but I commonly catch people in this state of ego-stroking and they panic when they get a few cannon rounds coming near them when they think they are out of range.
It’s not the ‘only’ option, so you can stop spawning it the instant you have enough SP, and do something else. You aren’t locked into this cycle, you’ve merely come to rely on it.
Yea, no…
Commonly the ODLs have already left before they see the rest of their team having issue, so this sort of throwout is unfounded and just assumptive.
Ah your favorite argument again
It’s not in response to yours, so maybe make an argument of your own instead of piggybacking on someone elses because you genuinely haven’t offered anything worthy.
No
Haha I won
Please come back with 4 Million people saying my argument was Bad or I won’t believe you
Adding this in after the fact shows you’re that caught up on flexing that you need to stop, because you aren’t here for discussion.
No
I am just playing your playbook
You’re delusional if that’s what you think was put forth to you… You can’t even link to the right polls and keep proclaiming numbers that aren’t measurable.
You’re actually proving my point I made in the first place about this thread and all like it. It’s actually so typical that you can’t handle being opposed so much you try and make arguments just for the sake of it.
Yea @Pacifica can we sort these guys out, it’s getting tiresome to have these statements made for me, scenarios changed because they got a point made that didn’t suit their angle, and constantly nitpicking names and making assumptions about what people use to justify in these guys minds why anyone at all would possibly disagree with what they’re wanting when the game is as it is, and they want it changed to suit them, and only in that manner, because checks notes ‘planes are bad and pilots are mean’…
Why are you guys so against ADDING Tanks only mode to AB, RB and SB WITHOUT REMOVING existing game modes?
Because…
Because that would limit the number of tank targets
And then there is the test they made many year’s ago
I mean if they wanna destroy tanks so much they can do it in current AB.
Which no one is able to provide any info about.
Source „trust me bro”
So only because you dissagre with someoens opinion?
Exactly and even if it was well documented that data is so old it can’t really be used on the current Game