Im tired of playing my MiG-23MLD while i fight against F-14s and MiG-29s, its absurdly unfair!! their missiles are better and they have better rate of ascension.
Gaijin really needs to update the BRs, maybe making 16.0, and changing from BR the planes that shouldn’t be in downtiers. There’s a LOT of planes that are impossible to use against other modern vehicles, like the B-29s in uptiers of 8.0 or the La-9s fighting against early jets.
I hope i said all i needed to say correctly, cuz my English isn’t the best, and im done with the unbalanced matches in this game, im actually containing myself to not put a bad review of this stupid game because its unfair in certain areas.
And hope nobody is going to start saying stupid things like “skill issue”, “u’re bad playing jets? go back to arcade 4.3” or such things.
8 Likes
while i think its annoying to die to magic 2 the Mig-23 is probably to good for 11.7 so i think its should be 12.0 but compression does need reduction we need 15.0 now
6 Likes
yeah its very good, i won an energy fight against a mirage F1CT, but i don’t think it should be at 12.0, there are a lot of good planes at 12.0 that can desintegrate the MiG-23MLD, like the Yak-141, or the german MiG-29, which have R-27ER that are a lot superior than the R-24R
2 Likes
we need decomp because there are 12.0 like F4J vs 11.7s like MIG-23MLD after decomp these should be same BR
2 Likes
I think that we could easily get up to 16.0 without causing any issues.
Currently 12.7-14.0 could be spread out to atleast 2.0 BRs, rather than 1.3. You can get another 0.3 or 0.7 by decompressing the current 10.7-12.3 range. You can easily get a 0.7 out of the current 9.3-10.3 range, and the 7.0-9.0 range could be spread out by 0.7.
5 Likes
I can’t imagine dying to an F-14 in Mig-23MLD.
I can understand a dogfight against Mig-29, but not its radar missile.
12.0? the same br as the bison? lmao
F4-J is at that BR there are many mid 12.0s ive havent fought many bisons
entire line of british phantoms mid
in RB the Bison is 12.3.
The Mig-23MLD could go to 12.0 due to it having a better RWR and slightly better flight performance than the ML and MLA at the same BR.
f4j much better than the mig23. better radar, fox 2s and fox 1s.
1 Like
i far prefer flight performance both are good for br especially mld i wouldnt consider R60MK worse than a 9G and i wouldnt consider the R24R bad either
there not better you carry more of them
But it comes with trade off of flight performance
aim7f is absolutely better than r24rs imo. also im not an r60 hater, but no way in hell i would ever pick an r60 over the aim9g. aim9g is MUCH better
1 Like
i prefer the all aspect in my opinion rear plus you also get R13
all aspect is usefull, not nearly as usefull as the long range motor on the 9g.
in what way other than speed the R24R off top my head has 35 g pull to sparrows 25 and 3.5 mach accelration