When do you think more T-family variants would see a daylight

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
,
2

Forgot T-64’s
itsovernapoleon

9 Likes
3

RIGHT i knew i forgor something…

3 Likes
4

But did USSR have other versions than A and B?

5

Object 432, object 003 (T-64T), object 476 and object 219 sp1 (prototype of the T-80, but it’s an T-64A but with 1000hp turbine engine. So still a T-64)

5 Likes
6

Then there’s the 1975 model:

And the best T-64 variant in my opinion is the object 021:

5 Likes
7

Tbh, yeah I would research them all just if they would be here

2 Likes
8

Dont we already have the T-80UM-1? Wasn’t it a event vehicle like a few years back?

9

That’s the T-80UM2 you’re talking about. The um1 has better aps on the same platform.

10

Ahh okay thank you

11

I’m still waiting for the T-55AMV and T-64MV; I find them much more interesting than including random prototypes.

12

Isn’t T-64MV just Uzbekistan modernization? I had in mind only those which USSR/Russia came up with.

13

Everyone forget T64 😿

14

Its a soviet tank.

15

They could put on the Bulat.

16

Gaijin (and the community apparently) seem to be drooling over modern day high-tech stuff at the minute (on the ground and in the air). I doubt you’ll see anything from the Cold War era any time soon. Which is a shame. I hope I am wrong. Cold War needs to get some serious attention.

But, I can tell you one thing. WE DO NOT NEED MORE T-80s!

3 Likes
17

You’re right. We don’t need just more t80s, we need ALL the t80s.

1 Like
18

WE NEED MORE T-80’S!!!

3 Likes
19

Even for TT? 😢

20

A model of the initial T-72B, without the Kontakt 1, would also be interesting. In addition, more models of the T-80 and T-72 with different hull armor would be welcome.
It would also be interesting to give all the T-54s the bullets they historically used, and add the T-54A.
And as I said before, the T-55AMV and T-62MV, but the 60° penetration of the 100mm 3BM25 and the 115mm 3BM21 should be reviewed, as they penetrate less at 60° than they should, since they are bullets with the same penetrator design as the 125mm 3BM22, and the statistics clearly show that the 60° penetration calculation for the 3BM22 is superior to that of the two previously mentioned.Also, after the ammunition correction, the T-55A should be equipped with the 3BM8, leaving it with the 3BM8.

3 Likes
21

Gaijin should seriously consider the following vehicles:

T-34-85 (1969)
SU-100 (1969)
T-44M/MS
ISU-152K/M
IS-2M
IS-3M

These are all Cold War modernizations of otherwise WW2 Soviet tanks. They come with improved engines with higher horsepower and in most cases HEAT ammunition. I will do a massive post on it once all of my suggestions get published.

Fun facts: IS-2Ms and IS-3Ms served until the late 90s with the Russian Armed Forces. Meanwhile, an ISU-152M was knocked out in Iraq in 2003. Su-100s and T-34-85s Model 1960/69 and their Czech/Polish counterparts are in reserve/active combat to this day.

2 Likes