Sea Vixen is a beast especially when top br, the 4 red tops are excellent for their br.
The best 10.0 would be the Mirage IIIC.
I personally only used the israeli Mirage IIICJ “Shahak”, and its damn good, excelent speed, radar and IR missile, both having more than enough G force to kill manoeuvring planes, some with not even flares.
Then why I said the french one and not israeli one?? Well aside that the french one have better CAS options, it also have a long fuel booster for extra speed and 35G matra IR missiles, in compare of the shahak 20G sidewinder. Top of that keeping the same br.
1 Like
So target him earlier with a high-g missile that he can’t do much about unless he is pre-positioning to defend
What BR do you think the Mirage 3C would be if not 10.0 without flares and having a weak engine?
Most 10.0s if not all of them and for sure all 10.3s are just strictly better jets than the MiG-19 in air RB.
problem is that for where its fair against lower jets its pushed up to where its seeing aim 9L below it because of compression.
i dont think magic 1 should be seeing current 9.7 planes let alone anything else. jet BRs are so horrifically compressed and full of legacy BRs that its just horrendous to play overall.
we need top tier to be around 20.0 to give planes enough breathing room to all be semi viable at their BRs and not be violently overmatched in an uptier
1 Like
why, its a simple rear aspect missile that simply requires you to not let the mirage 3 slot onto you for free
its a very good rear aspect missile. better than the aim 9G and on a better platform than aim 9g slingers of that BR region.
its a great missile while things around it mostly have red top or 9E equals
The best 7.0 jet is about to be the Spit Mk XXIV lols (jk this is attrocious that it and the zeros are being treated the way they are)
obviously yes, but still heavily limited by being rear aspect. All a lower BR jet has to do is keep the Mirage 3C from getting a free look at their engine, which is not incredibly difficult.
Has about half the range of the 9G in exchange for more agility, it’s not better. Sidegrade.
i honestly dont think rear aspect is a limitation when the majority are using 9B.
use it the same way the 9.7 harriers have to be used, top down missile launches. the range is also a non issue for that.
Doesn’t work like that. Simply do not let the Mirage 3C on your six. Not hard.
This is not how the magic 1 is employed.
this is just the cop out “just notch bro” argument lol
then you are playing that BR wrong plain and simple
1 Like
Just say you aren’t very good and have issues with letting people on your six i guess. For the record, notching is usually the answer to radar missiles as well.
Let’s compare our Mirage 3C stats:
Me:
You:
k/d of 3 when allegedly not doing top attacks and pretending the plane isnt unfair. sure thing.
if a K/D of 3 is all it takes for you to declare a plane is “unfair” and not just “good” then you should check out literally every other plane I have ever flown, gonna blow your mind
Also, it was a good attempt but we’re not moving on from you speaking on planes you have never flown and never will fly
Its probably the sabre, its really fun with good maneuverability and because the guns have a lot of ammo you can really frag out and get alot pf kills in a downtier
2 Likes
I mean:
Wait until you find out about the Hunter FGA.9
Is this jet way too strong for 9.3? Should it be a higher BR Caernarvon? What about the F-4E in that same picture?
should hunters be higher? Does a fish swim?
So you REALLY think the FGA.9 belongs at 9.7+?
I’m sure you think the G.56 is just busted overpowered for 6.3 and deserves to be 7.0 too right
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
yes. Hunters are extremely oppressive. immaculate STR, great guns and more than fast enough to always be a danger.
they should all be moved up a bit. F1 back to 9.0, FGA9 (and the other 9.3 hunters) to 9.7, F6 sraam to 10.0, F58 to 10.7 as its got flares.
inB4 “wutabout X plane it will be flying with”