I know it spent a lot of its life in the Vietnam war, but it was developed at the end of the Korean war. Kind of crazy to think. It is a nearly 70 year old design now.
F-14B never had AIM-120s.
The F-15C we have never had twin rail body mounts.
APG-70 is used on a different F-15C than what we have in-game.
Those are entirely different assets.
That version of the EX isn’t used currently.
Research a bit better next time.
also R3R for m/mf
Why not just play another F-4 if you dislike the idea of a sparrow/IRCCM slinger Phantom so much?
Again, seems like the F-4S would fit what you want much better if it got its historical armament. Stop being a helicopter parent for a jet, it looks ridiculous.
EJ Kai with its current historical armament is what I love. There’s also no replacement for its BR.
F-15J is what I use for AAM-3s.
And F-4F ICE is what I use for an IRCCM Phantom.
Leopard 2a4 variants receiving DM 33
1 Like
Again, I will recommend a different tech tree for you if you don’t want Japanese aircraft to get the domestically produced missiles they used in service.
Otherwise, you’re just being a stick-in-the-mud who wants the status quo to stay the same because you’ve grown too comfortable with it.
1 Like
Provide a replacement for the EJ Kai’s BR.
It already has historical loadouts.
I already do play another tech tree for IRCCM F-4 Phantom: Germany.
I don’t need 2, let alone the 2nd removing the exclusive PD F-4 from 12.X without a replacement for that BR.
That’s really just too bad, as the game does not hinge entirely on what you want.
EJ Kai getting AAM-3s was already passed to devs at some point relatively recently, so that much is clear.
2 Likes
Passed to devs =/= introduced.
EJ Kai will likely not receive AAM-3s.
Devs knew EJ Kai had AAM-3s an entire year before it came to War Thunder.
Devs know plenty of things that were only implemented later (and some that have yet to be implemented despite being promised).
1 Like
- AIM-120 for Italian F-16ADF with removal of Sparrows (as equipment needed to use them was removed during modernization).
- Sispre C-7 for some Italian jets (it was tested on F-84G, F-86K, CL-13 mk.4 and G.91s)
Sispre C7 - AIM-9L/I and AIM-9L/I-1 for Italian jets instead of AIM-9M;
- Medusa 81 mm rockets for A129 helicopters family;
(Modification) Addition of BPD 81mm Medusa rockets for A129 Mangusta+variants. - Italy - War Thunder - Official Forum - T108 heat shell for M26A1.
6 Likes
J-7E PL-8 PL-5C
J-8B PL-8 PL-5C
J-8F PL-8B
JH-7A PL-8B KD-88 PL-12
China still lacks a lot
5 Likes
AMX-30B2 BRENUS w/ the OFL 105 G2, G3, or even the powerful F2 APFSDS-T round and moved up to 9.0-9.3 to differentiate it from AMX-30B2. Balancer would be its lack of stabilizer in exchange for high pen. Would have to be a sniper. Currently, the AMX-30B2 and AMX-30B2 BRENUS are the same BR.
CN-105 F1 Cannon Ammunition Chart courtesy of @CaID.
And AIM-120B (placeholder), AIM-9M, and AIM-9P-4 for ROCAF F-16A MLU.
2 Likes
this chart is old and outdated. here is the new one with the measurement verified and redone for each rounds based on the actual rounds
the G2 and G3 performance was nerfed and happen to be very close to the information shared by Giat industry
1 Like
Thanks for the updated chart 🤙
Do you have an updated French Armament and Ammuniotion Catalogue forum page like your old one?
no, I do not sadly. a lot of the information in the old one remains correct. and I still use it once in a while. but it’s still incomplete. there were hours of work behind it and I also worked on dozens of other projects at the same time so I had to prioritize something over the other.
also, the new forum is incompatible with the table format. so I do not know if I will ever make a new one.
also, I would love to see the Vextra with the OFL G2. it would allow it to be higher BR and since most players take it with the Leclerc in their line-up, it’s clear it needs a bit of buff (and a higher BR coming with it)
1 Like
I think it will get its buff. Seeing how the modification tree layout is for it, it’s likely going to get a new round. At least imo.
Also thanks for all the work into the catalogue, it’s helped out quite a bit.
1 Like
Afraid you wouldn’t be happy with what pylons the R-73 take up on the prototype MLD that received the R-73.
It’s either you have long range SARH/IR missiles like R-24 or you get 2 improved short range IR missiles to go with 4x R-60M. The R-73 used R-24 pylons under the wing gloves, so it’d be a pretty significant tradeoff. Can’t just whole cloth replace the R-60M with 4x R-73 and 2x R-24.
3 Likes