To give an example, Let’s say the jap f-1. It’s currently missing it’s 9L’s, chaff pods and anti ship missiles.
4 Likes
F-4F is missing its Aim-9L and only gets J’s.
5 Likes
All western MBT´s not having there FCS systems implementet and being forced to play like Soviet tanks. Just ranging. No automatic lead on the move or stationary.
Spikes not being able to be contorled but being just very bad F&F gimick toys. (they are the evoltion and step up from the TOW/HOT but in WT they are just miserable.
No Leopard 2A4 C-Tech.
No proper passive tracking for Roland but every airplane still gets a warning.
No data sharing in between roland systems. Only one actvive orland is needed with randar on and all other rolands can use that to track targets while being invisble.
9 Likes
Strf 9040 & CV90s all getting their godamn UTAAS tracking. for god sake there is so much provided evidence that they just ignored or shot down! (probably to keep the 2S38 & BMP-2M)
4 Likes
R-73 for mig-23MLD
real Ariete armor
antiship missiles for mig-27/su-17
3 Likes
AH-64Ds getting Longbow Hellfires.
8 Likes
We don’t do historical here.
7 Likes
SU39 /25T the Full Anti Air Loadout with 8x R73 or 6x R27 so they can compete in Air battles
2 Likes
XM8, US event light tank.
Increase BR from 9.7 to 10.3 and give M900
The XM8 was a 1990s vehicle, and M900 was the ammunition it would use historically.
Furthermore, 9.7 is a pointless BR for USA as there is no lineup for it.
I think it would better complement the M1 Abrams in the 10.3 lineup
3 Likes
All weapons currently in War Thunder are historical weapons.
What you’re asking for are weapons that would make the aircraft unplayable.
Prove that FCS is in the game.
Oh, you contradicted your previous claim.
Automatic lead was introduced in T-64, and standard in all T-72s forward.
Use IR tracking…
Datalink isn’t in the game period.
They don’t have it IRL.
Your claim has already been disproved by countless bug reporters and a few technical moderators.
Nope, no soviet era tank has this. Not mention the use of laser range finder and even then manual adjustment. Dont eget me startet. The only thing the soviet tanks can is keepp the barrel verticly allinged. There is no no lead not tracking.
Now that you’re talking about the F-1.
Gaijin should just give it the basic CM load the plane could’ve had (30-60) and 4x 9Ls, following a BR bump. It won’t be a monster but it’ll definately will be more enjoyable to play in comparison to its current matchmaker.
1 Like
T-72s have always had auto-track IRL.
You do realize Chieftains had that too, right?
It’s not something that only started existing with Leopard 2s, Abrams, and T-80s.
The Sholef. It didn’t have an L/39 gun. It had an L/45.
5 Likes
No they never had autorack irl.
use the whole qoute. You just show your dishonesty.
5 Likes
tortoise getting the APDS that was developed for the 32pdr gun and a bump to 7.0, and maybe the 32pdr centurion test tank, it packs one hell of a punch and would be an interesting broomstick tank to see at 7.7-8.0
4 Likes
Actually it’s more like missing its AIM-9B and AIM-9F and has overperforming missiles in the form of ahistorical AIM-9Js.
if MLD gets R_73 it’ll go up in BR even more, probably to 12.3, also our MiG-23MLD never used R-73s so it wouldn’t be historical anyway. You’re thinking of a specific one off MiG-23
would make it even more useless
1 Like
lmao. i dont get many shell shatters at all with 17&20pdr apds I don’t really get the hate
1 Like